单选题In the next century we'll be able to alter our DNA radically, encoding our visions and vanities while concocting new life-forms. When Dr. Frankenstein made his monster, he wrestled with the moral issue of whether he should allow it to reproduce, "Had I the right, for my own benefit, to inflict the curse upon everlasting generations?" Will such questions require us to develop new moral philosophies? Probably not. Instead, we'll reach again for a time-tested moral concept, one sometimes called the Golden Rule and which Kant, the millennium's most prudent moralist, conjured up into a categorical imperative: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; treat each person as an individual rather than as a means to some end. Under this moral precept we should recoil at human cloning, because it inevitably entails using humans as means to other humans' ends and valuing them as copies of others we loved or as collections of body parts, not as individuals in their own right. We should also draw a line, however fuzzy, that would permit using genetic engineering to cure diseases and disabilities but not to change the personal attributes that make someone an individual (IQ, physical appearance, gender and sexuality). The biotech age will also give us more reason to guard our personal privacy. Aldous Huxley in Brave New World, got it wrong: rather than centralizing power in the hands of the state, DNA technology has empowered individuals and families. But the state will have an important role, making sure that no one, including insurance companies, can look at our genetic data without our permission or use it to discriminate against us. Then we can get ready for the breakthroughs that could come at the end of the next century and the technology is comparable to mapping our genes: plotting the 10 billion or more neurons of our brain. With that information we might someday be able to create artificial intelligences that think and experience consciousness in ways that are indistinguishable from a human brain. Eventually we might be able to replicate our own minds in a "dry-ware" machine, so that we could live on without the "wet-ware" of a biological brain and body. The 20th century's revolution in infotechnology will thereby merge with the 21st century's revolution in biotechnology. But this is science fiction. Let's turn the page now and get back to real science.

单选题A．劳神过度B．外邪侵袭C．先天不足D．情志因素

单选题目眦色赤，多属

单选题珍珠母丸的功用是

单选题至宝丹主治什么证候

单选题A．咽干口燥B．失眠多梦C．两者均有D．两者均无

单选题A．木香B．香附C．白芍D．赤芍

单选题陈无择的三因分类法中，“不内外因”为

单选题患者游走性关节疼痛，可涉及一个或多个关节，活动不便，局部灼热红肿，痛不可触，得冷则舒，可有皮下结节或红斑，常伴有发热、恶风、汗出、口渴、烦躁不安等全身症状，舌质红，舌苔黄或黄腻，脉滑数。其诊断为

单选题心胸烦热，口渴面赤，意欲饮冷，口舌生疮，小便赤涩刺痛，舌红，脉数，治疗常用

单选题表现为咳声重浊，吐痰色白的是

单选题往来寒热，胸胁苦满，呕不止，郁郁微烦，心下满痛，协热下利，舌苔黄，脉弦有力

单选题It's easy to get the sense these days that you've stumbled into a party with some powerful drug that dramatically alters identity. The faces are familiar, but the words coming out of them aren't. Something has happened to a lot of people you used to think you knew. They've changed into something like their own opposite. There's Bill Gates, who these days is spending less time earning money than giving it away--and pulling other billionaires into the deep end of global philanthropy(慈善事业) with him. There's historian Francis Fukuyama, leading a whole gang of disaffected fellow travelers away from neoconservatism. To flip-flopis human. It can still sometimes be a political liability, evidence of a flaky disposition or rank opportunism. But there are circumstances in which not to reverse course seems almost pathological(病态的). He's a model of consistency, Stephen Colbert said last year of George W. Bush:" He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday -- no matter what happened on Tuesday." Over the past three years, I found people who had pulled a big U-turn in their lives. Often the insight came in a forehead-smiting moment in the middle of the night: I've got it all wrong. It looked at first like a sprinkling of outliers beyond the curve of normal human experience. But when you stepped back, a pattern emerged. What these personal turns had in common was the apprehension that we're all connected. Everything leans on something, is both dependent and depended on. "The difference between you and me," a visiting Chinese student told University of Michigan psychologist Richard Nisbett not long ago," is that I think the world is a circle, and you think it's a line." The remark prompted the professor to write a book, The Geography of Thought, about the differences between the Western and the Asian mind. To Western thinking, the world is linear; you can chop it up and analyze it, and we can all work on our little part of the project independently until it's solved. The classically Eastern mind, according to Nisbett, sees things differently: the world isn't a length of rope but a vast, closed chain, incomprehensibly complex and ever changing. When you look at life from this second perspective, some unlikely connections reveal themselves. I realized this was what almost all the U-turns had in common: people had swung around to face East. They had stopped thinking in a line and started thinking in a circle. Morality was looking less like a set of rules and more like a story, one in which they were part of an ensemble cast, no longer the star.

单选题下述哪项是手指稍用力，寻抚局部的按诊方法

单选题A．怒则气上B．悲则气消C．惊则气乱D．恐则气下

单选题患者腰痛如刺，痛有定处，痛处拒按，日轻夜重，轻者俯仰不便，重则不能转侧。舌质暗紫，或有瘀斑，脉涩。治宜选用

单选题大柴胡汤中柴胡与生姜的用量比例是

单选题八纲辨证的概念与内容，实际形成于

单选题A．实证B．虚证C．寒证D．热证E．表证

单选题咳声清脆者，多属A．寒湿B．燥热C．肺气不宣D．肾水不足E．肺实