问答题潘某，女，18岁，半月前因高考落榜，烦躁失眠，近日则胡言乱语，哭笑无常，狂躁不安，终日不眠，面红目赤痰多，小便黄少，大便干三日未行，舌红苔黄腻脉濡数。请作出证候诊断及分析。

问答题(46) Globalization might be welcomed on many grounds—the economic, political, communicational, and even linguistic ones come readily to mind but it also has some unfortunate side effects that might prove deadly to the very future of mankind. This is no mere surmise of congenital misanthropes, but the expressed fear of some who are otherwise well disposed to it. Thus Thomas Friedman, in an otherwise optimistically minded book, nevertheless, writes as follows: (47) The more I observed the system of globalization at work, the more obvious it was that it had unleashed forest-crushing forces of development, which if left unchecked had the potential to destroy the environment and uproot culture... (48) And because globalization as a culturally homogenizing and environment-devouring force is coming on so fast, there is real danger that in just a few decades it will wipe out the ecological and cultural diversity that took millions of years of human and biological forces to produce. Something is as ominous as all that is a real threat indeed. (49) And yet, despite such apprehensions, Friedman and others who think like him believe that effects of this magnitude can somehow be sidestepped without interfering with the technicizing sweep of globalization. Is that merely wishful thinking or an inability to take in the full import of his own words? As Friedman points out, the globalization threat is at once to nature and to culture: to the environment and the whole ecological variety of plants and animals, as well as to the quality of human life and the cultural diversity on which it depends. Damage to nature eventually translates itself as damage to culture, and vice versa. The fate of many ancient civilizations that collapsed because they outgrew their natural resources is historical proof of that fact. Our modern civilization is subject to the same self-limiting conditions. (50) Thus, if all agriculture is reduced to an agribusiness industry, then the diversified countryside landscape that humans have created since the Neolithic revolution will become a monocultural ecological desert, for with it will disappear a host of animal and plant species as well as a whole rural way of life with its myriad varieties of folk cultures that have been carried on for millennia. The loss of natural species through the destruction of their natural habitat is paralleled step by step by the loss of cultural "species" through the elimination of their social habitat, which is rooted in a natural environment. The clearing of jungles does not merely exterminate the animals living there, but also the native people whose homes have been there for countless generations.

问答题体质的形成、分类与中医辨证的关系如何。

问答题证候错杂

问答题大肠湿热证

问答题吐舌

问答题Directions:ThechartindicatestheamountofmoneyperweekspentondifferenttypesoffastfoodinBritain.Thegraphshowsthetrendsinconsumptionoffastfood.Writeareportforyouruniversitylecturerdescribingtheinformationshowninbothcharts.Youshouldwriteabout160-200wordsneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.

问答题试述脉象研究方法及其进展。

问答题试述表证与里证的鉴别要点。

问答题全球化的兴起是席卷全世界的经济和文化趋势。当我们步人21世纪时，它已形成新的基础。但全球化的作用总是好的吗?一些人并不这么认为。 亚特兰大国际外交关系所所长麦克尔·特内特担心时下全世界对全球化兴起的厌恶之情。他说，“从20世纪80年代及亚洲龙在90年代后期的经济滑坡以来，人们就开始重新评价全球化能带来好处的观点。许多国家收入下降，贫富悬殊加大。若没有政府的进一步干预，我们在拉美和亚洲就会看到贫困升级的悲剧。” 在华尔街工作的一位有影响的经济学家乔治·弗兰克认为情况没那么糟。“即使市场机制可能引起短期动荡的问题，经济自由化，透明度增加和基于市场的改革都能带来长远的好处，”他说，“最重要的是要进一步解除贸易壁垒，这样消费品的竞争就会使价格降低，反过来提高收入的平均水平。” 其他人认为，全球化的文化影响比经济意义更为重要。非洲土著人贾妮斯·伊威强烈地感受到全球化严重削弱了她的本土文化和语言。她说，“全球化趋势下世界上大多数方言都会消失，这个世界上到处都是麦当劳快餐广告和英语俚语，这让我忧心忡忡。” 各国政府对全球化浪潮的反响有好有坏。美国被看成是国际贸易高度自由化的积极倡导者，由于它几乎垄断了全球娱乐业，它当然有极大的文化影响力。但其他国家，最明显的是欧洲和发展中国家，力图减少全球化对本国事务的影响。 一位新加坡居民说，“我还是个孩子的时候，我们国家没什么值得一提的，现在我们国家已成为了一个繁荣的国际金融中心。”不过，其他人可没有这么乐观。底特 律汽车制造厂一位工会委员评论道，“全球化是一股邪恶势力，必须被制止。它使工作机会减少，国家精神沦丧。”

问答题心火亢盛证与膀胱湿热证均可出现小便赤、涩、灼、痛，如何从病机及症状加以鉴别?

问答题Directions:Studythefollowingpicturecarefullyandwriteanessayto1)describethepicturebriefly,2)deducethepurposeofthedrawerofthepicture,and3)suggestcounter-measures.Youshouldwriteabout160--200wordsneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.

问答题Directions:Thefigureshowsthepercentageofemployeesineachoccupationabsentfromworkforatleastonedayinareferenceweekin1999duetoinjuryorillness.Writeareportforauniversitylecturedescribingtheinformationshownbelow.Youshouldwriteabout160—200wordsneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.Percentageofemployeesabsent(Figuresinbracketsequalnumberofemployeescouted)

问答题洪脉：

问答题(46) A long-held view of the history of the English colonies that became the United States has been that England' s policy toward these colonies before 1763 was dictated by commercial interests and that a change to a more imperial policy, dominated by expansionist militarist objectives, generated the tensions that ultimately led to the American Revolution. In a recent study, Stephen Saunders Webb has resented a formidable challenge to this view. According to Webb, England already had a military imperial policy for more than a century before the American Revolution. He sees Charles Ⅱ, the English monarch between 1660 and 1685, as the proper successor of the Tudor monarchs of the sixteenth century and of Oliver Cromwell, all of whom were bent on extending centralized executive power over England' s possessions through the use of what Webb calls "garrison government." Garrison government allowed the colonists a legislative assembly, but real authority, in Webb' s view, belonged to the colonial governor, who was appointed by the king and supported by the "garrison," that is. by the local contingent of English troops under the colonial governor' s command. According to Webb, the purpose of garrison government was to provide military support for a royal policy designed to limit the power of the upper classes in the American colonies. (47) Webb argues that the colonial legislative assemblies represented the interests not of the common people but of the colonial upper classes, a coalition of merchants and nobility who favored self-rule and sought to elevate legislative authority at the expense of the executive. It was, according to Webb, the colonial governors who favored the small farmer, opposed the plantation system, and tried through taxation to break up large holdings of land. Backed by the military presence of the garrison, these governors tried to prevent the gentry and merchants, allied in the colonial assemblies, from transforming colonial America into a capitalistic oligarchy. (48) Webb' s study illuminates the political alignments that existed in the colonies in the century prior to the American Revolution, but his view of the crown' s use of the military as an instrument of colonial policy is not entirely convincing. England during the seventeenth century was not noted for its military achievements. Cromwell did mount England's most ambitious overseas military expedition in more than a century, but it proved to be an utter failure. Under Charles Ⅱ, the English army was too small to be a major instrument of government. (49) Not until the war in France in 1697 did William Ⅲ persuade Parliament to create a professional standing army, and Parliament' s price for doing so was to keep the army under tight legislative control. (50) While it may be true that the crown attempted to diminish the power of the colonial upper classes, it is hard to imagine how the English army during the seventeenth century could have provided significant military support for such a policy.

问答题麻疹、风疹、瘾疹三者的出疹特点有何不同?

问答题虫积证

问答题肝郁气滞证

问答题独语：

问答题范某，女，30岁，一年前因人流手术不当，致子宫出血过多，至今身体虚弱。现面色酰白，畏寒肢冷，气短乏力，精神萎靡，乳房萎缩，阴毛脱落，性欲冷淡，月经后期而量极少，腰酸膝软，下肢时有浮肿，二便如常，舌淡嫩苔少脉沉细无力。请做出证候诊断及分析。