学科分类

已选分类 理学生物学生物化学与分子生物学
单选题A.磷酸甘油酸激酶B.烯醇化酶C.丙酮酸激酶D.丙酮酸羧化酶
进入题库练习
单选题草酰乙酸不能直接转变生成的物质是
进入题库练习
单选题醛缩酶的催化产物是
进入题库练习
单选题人体内的不饱和脂肪酸可以自身合成的是
进入题库练习
单选题A.仅螺旋B.β折叠C.B转角D.无规卷曲E.π螺旋
进入题库练习
单选题A.嘌呤碱基B.嘧啶碱基C.嘌呤碱基与嘧啶碱基D.脱氧尿嘧啶核苷酸
进入题库练习
单选题指出何者是酵解过程中可被别构调节的限速酶( )(1994年)
进入题库练习
单选题脂蛋白的代谢过程需要下列哪些酶的参与
进入题库练习
单选题关于密码子的摆动性叙述正确的是
进入题库练习
单选题对于mRNA的叙述哪一项是恰当的
进入题库练习
单选题激活的PKC能磷酸化的氨基酸残基是
进入题库练习
单选题一个操纵子通常包含
进入题库练习
单选题酮体不能在肝中氧化的是肝中缺乏下列哪种酶( )(1993年)
进入题库练习
单选题胞浆NADH经α-磷酸甘油穿梭后氧化磷酸化产生的ATP数是( )(2008年)
进入题库练习
单选题真核生物中,1mol葡萄糖经糖有氧氧化可产生ATP摩尔数
进入题库练习
单选题There are countless parents who will not allow their children to play violent video games, in which players are able to kill, maim, dismember or sexually assault human images in depraved ways. The video game industry rates them, and some stores use that rating to decide whether to sell a particular game to a minor. But California went too far in 2005 when it made it illegal to sell violent video games to minors. Retailers challenged the law, and a federal appeals court rightly ruled that it violates the First Amendment. Last week, the Supreme Court said that it would review that decision. We hope it agrees that the law is unconstitutional. California's law imposes fines of up to $1,000 on retailers that sell violent video games to anyone under 18. To qualify, a game must, as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors. But video games are a form of free expression. Many have elaborate plots and characters, often drawn from fiction or history. The California law is a content-based restriction, something that is presumed invalid under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has made it clear that minors have First Amendment rights. California has tried to lower the constitutional standard for upholding the law by comparing it to "variable obscenity," a First Amendment principle that allows banning the sale of some sexually explicit materials to minors that cannot be banned for adults. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, like other federal courts, rightly refused to extend that doctrine to violent games. Under traditional First Amendment analysis, content-based speech restrictions can survive only if they are narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest. California says its interest is in preventing psychological or neurological damage to young people. The appeals court concluded that the evidence connecting violent video games to this sort of damage is too weak to make restricting the games a compelling government interest. Even if the interest were legitimate, the state could have used less restrictive methods. The video game industry, like the movie business, has a voluntary rating system that provides buyers and sellers with information on the content of specific games, including age-specific ratings, ranging from "early childhood" to "adults only. " The government could do more to promote the use of voluntary ratings by retailers and parents. California lawmakers may have been right when they decided that video games in which players kill and maim are not the most socially beneficial form of expression. The Constitution, however, does not require speech to be ideal for it to be protected.
进入题库练习
单选题NADPH的生理意义不含
进入题库练习
单选题乙酰CoA是哪个酶的变构激活剂
进入题库练习
单选题去甲肾上腺素可来自( )(1992年)
进入题库练习
单选题辅酶Q能将电子传递给
进入题库练习