填空题Google already has a window into our souls through our Internet searches and it now has insight into our ailing bodies too. The Internet giant is using its vast database of individual search terms to (67) the emergence of flu up to two weeks (68) government epidemiologists. Google Flu Trends uses the (69) of people to seek online help for their health problems. By tracking (70) for terms such as "cough", "fever" and "aches and pains", it claims to be able to (71) estimate where fluis 72. Google tested the idea in nine regions of the US and found it could accurately predict flu (73) between 7 and 14 days earlier than the federal centres for disease control and prevention. Google hopes the idea could also be used to help (74) other diseases. Flu Trends is limited (75) the US. Jeremy Ginsberg and Matt Mohebb, two software engineers (76) in the project, said that (77) in Google search queries can be very (78) . In a blogpost on the project they wrote: "It turns (79) that traditional flu surveillance systems take 1 to 2 weeks to collect and (80) surveillance data but Google search queries can be (81) counted very quickly. By making our estimates (82) each day, Flu Trends may provide an early-warning system for outbreaks of influenza." They explained that (83) information health would be kept (84) "Flu Trends can never be used to identify individual users (85) we rely on anonymised, aggregated counts of how often certain search queries (86) each week./

填空题It is vital that ______ (每个孩子都享有受教育的权利).

填空题S5. The phrase "the linguistically oppressed"( Line 5, Para. 4) refers to those who were ________.

填空题Judging from the American values, those who have been down and out in the battle of life should ______.

填空题There are altogether about 100 mid-term and final exams over a four-year period of college education.

填空题Hearing the name of an object appears to influence whether or not we see it, suggesting that hearing and vision might be even more intertwined than previously thought. Studies suggest that words and images are 1 coupled. What is not clear, says Gary Lupyan of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, is whether language and 2 work together to help you 3 what you"re seeing, or whether words can actually change what you see. Lupyan and Emily Ward of Yale University used a technique called continuous flash suppression (CFS) on 20 volunteers to test whether a spoken prompt could make them detect an image that they were not 4 aware they were seeing. CFS works by 5 different images to the right and left eyes: one eye might be shown a simple shape or an animal, 6 the other is shown visual "noise". The noise monopolizes (垄断) the brain, leaving so little processing power for the other image, making it 7 . In a similar experiment, the team found that volunteers were more likely to detect specific 8 if asked about them. For example, asking "Do you see a square?" made it more likely than that they would see a hidden 9 but not a hidden circle. James McClelland of Stanford University in California, who was not 10 in the work, thinks it is an important study. It suggests that sight and language are intertwined, he says. A. visible F. displaying K. shapes B. vision G. however L. tightly C. square H. while M. invisible D. consciously I. involved N. using E. usually J. interpret O. given

填空题Oysters are found to have a persistent rhythm.

填空题One kind of deafness is caused by damage in the brain or to ______.

填空题{{B}}Section B{{/B}}{{B}}Passage One{{/B}} "Tear' em apart? "Kill the fool!" "Murder the referee (裁判)!" These are common remarks one may hear at various sporting events. At the time they are made, they may seem innocent enough. But let's not kid ourselves. They have been known to influence behavior in such a way as to lead to real bloodshed. Volumes have been written about the way words affect us. It has been shown that words having certain connotations (含义) may cause us to react in ways quite foreign to what we consider to be our usual humanistic behavior. I see the term "opponent" as one of those words. Perhaps the time has come to delete it from sports terms. The dictionary meaning of the term "opponent" is "adversary"; "enemy"; "one who opposes your interests." Thus, when a player meets an opponent, he or she may tend to treat that opponent as an enemy. At such times, winning may dominate one's intellect, and every action, no matter how gross, may be considered justifiable. I recall an incident in a handball game when a referee refused a player's request for a time out for a glove change because he did not consider them wet enough. The player proceeded to rub his gloves across his wet T-shirt and then exclaimed, "Are they wet enough now?" In the heat of battle, players have been observed to throw themselves across the court without considering the consequences that such a move might have on anyone in their way. I have also witnessed a player reacting to his opponent's intentional and illegal blocking by deliberately hitting him with the ball as hard as he could during the course of play. Off the court, they are good friends. Does that make any sense? It certainly gives proof of a court attitude which departs from normal behavior. Therefore, I believe it is time we elevated (提升) the game to the level where it belongs, thereby setting an example to the rest of the sporting world. Replacing the term "opponent" with "associate" could be an ideal way to start. The dictionary meaning of the term "associate" is "colleague"; "friend"; "companion." Reflect a moment! You may soon see and possibly feel the difference in your reaction to the term "associate" rather than "opponent."

填空题What is the store window equipped with for showing the cats?

填空题Frogs are disappearing only from city areas.

填空题According to the author, the more effective way to solve "cultural shock" is____________________.