单选题The suggestion ______ all right. [A] has sounded [B] is sounded [C] sounds

单选题If you want to use your Business Telecard International, you have to

单选题Why can you look at an object in the real world and see it as a three-dimensional (三维的) object, but if you see that same object on a television, it looks flat? What"s going on, and how does 3-D technology get around the problem? It all has to do with the way we see objects. When the light that travels to an object is sent back to our eyes, our brains understand the light and make up a picture in our minds. When an object is far away, the light travelling to one eye is parallel (平行的) with the light travelling to the other eye. But as an object gets closer, the lines are no longer parallel—they move toward the same point where they join. You can see this effect if you try to look at something right in front of your nose—you"ll get a lovely cross-eyed expression. When you look at an object, your brain measures the effort your eyes make to focus on the object as well as how much they had to gather the light to the same point. Together, this information allows you to guess how far away the object is. If your eyes had to gather the light with quite a big effort, then it stands to reason that the object is close to you. The secret to 3-D television and films is that by wearing a special pair of glasses and by showing each eye the same picture in two different places, you can make your brain think that the flat picture you"re seeing has depth. But this actually doesn"t match up the way we see real objects. While your eyes may gather two images (形象) that seem to be one object right in front of you, they"re actually focusing on pictures further away. This is why your eyes get very tired if you try to watch too many 3-D movies in one sitting.

单选题8:30PM Outlook Outlook is back with a new series of reports to keep you up date with all that's new in the world of entertainment. Stories go all the way from the technical to the romantic, from stage to screen. There will be reports of the stars of the moment, the stars of the future and the stars of the past. The director with his new film, the designer with the latest fashion, and the musician with the popular song are part of the new Outlook. The program is introduced by Fran Levine. 9:00PM Discovery When a 10-year-old boy gets a first-class degree in mathematics or an 8-year-old plays chess like a future grand master, they are considered as geniuses. Where does the quality of geniuses come from? Is it all in the genes or can any child be turned into a genius? And if parents do have a child who might become a genius in the future, what should they do? In this 30-minute film, Barry Johnson, the professor at School of Medicine, New York University will help you discover the answer. 10:00PM Science/Health Is it possible to beat high blood pressure without drugs? The answer is "yes", according to the researchers at Johns Hopking and three other medical centres. After a study of 800 persons with high blood pressure, they found that after 6 months those devoted to weight loss--exercise and eating a low-salt, low-fat food--lost about 13 pounds and became fitter. Plus, 35% of them dropped into the "normal" category (范畴). This week, Dr. Alan Duckworth will tell you how these people reduce their blood pressure to a level similar to what's achieved with Hypertension drags.

单选题What is the woman going to do this afternoon?

单选题

单选题

单选题WhomissedtheTVspecial?

单选题 听第7段材料，回答第8～10题。

单选题

单选题I'm afraid it______tomorrow, but who knows?[A] may have rained[B] might rain[C] would rain[D] ought to rain

单选题HowmuchmoneydidRockfellerhave?

单选题听下面5段对话或独白。每段对话或独白后有几个小题，从题中所给的A、B、C三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷的相应位置。听每段对话或独白前，你将有5秒钟的时间阅读各个小题；听完后，各小题将给出5秒钟的作答时间。每段对话或独白读两遍。

单选题听第7段对话，回答第8～10题。

单选题In the first paragraph, "took care of" means ______.

单选题Editor: These days there has been a lot of talk about cutting a day off the sixday work week. I find one excuse for not taking this system (制度) unacceptable. It says that under today's conditions, when our work efficiency is still very low and the work-load quite heavy, we cannot follow the ex- ample of technologically advanced western countries in practising the five-day work week. Their conclusion is: The time is not ripe for such a system. I really don' t see much point in this argument (争论,论点). They say the efficiency of the majority of our workers has been very low, but do they know what caused today's low efficiency? It's old time requirement that no matter how soon you can get your work done, you must still stick to your post and never leave. If we do not start a new system that is more exciting now , there are few chances that the low efficiency in our work can be changed.