单选题
单选题Whatdoesthemansayabouttheseminar?
单选题Whatisanactiveholidayaccordingtotheman?A.Sittingaround.B.Withjoysofsocialactivities.C.Doingnothing.D.Holidaywithalotofexercise.
单选题
单选题
单选题 Following Martin Wedell's piece "Local teacher or
native speaker?" now is perhaps a good time to explore the discomfort over the
use of "Native speaker" (NS) and "Non native speaker" (NNS). The discomfort may
stem partly from the fact that the word "native" is sometimes misguidedly used
to mean a primitive sort of savage; also partly because there will be an
increasing number of expert English users all over the world who did not start
their lives speaking English. The expression "mother tongue"
may be suffering the same guilt complex. Is it fair to brand a girl a NNS of
English because her mother was a French speaker while her father spoke English?
"Father tongue" then? Or should it have been "motherland tongue"? Fairer even
might be "environment tongue" for children growing up in an English speaking
environment (even though their parents might speak another language at
home). Students often tell me that they come to the U. K.
because they want to learn "pure" English in the "original" environment. While I
agree that learning in an English environment leads to more effective English
learning, this "purity" is a dangerous concept and I believe it is closely
linked to "mother" values and the term "native speakers".
"Motherland" and "fatherland" imply a patriotic love for one's country, but
language cannot easily work in this way, particularly when it is a "world
language" we are talking about. True, language is closely related to "culture"
but, for most modern users of English in the world, language is more about
international communication than nationality. Terms such as
"monolingual", "bilingual" and "multilingual" may be more appropriate for the
future. Or perhaps the fairest way is to eliminate altogether the need for these
terms. There is some concrete evidence that NNS and "mother tongue" are already
losing their influence. To study for the RSA Cambridge
Certificate or Diploma in Teaching English as a Foreign Language to Adults
(CELTA or DELTA), teacher trainees no longer need to have English as their first
language and there is no mention of NS or NNS. The CELTA rubric, for example,
states that participants must be "able to use written and spoken language in the
classroom which is clear and coherent and essentially free of mistakes in
spelling, punctuation and grammar". There is no mention of where the trainee was
born or grew up. More broadly, in English speaking countries,
bilingual and trilingual people from a variety of backgrounds are now not at all
rare. These people speak nearly perfect English and are accepted, I believe, as
"native speakers" would be (that is... if I used that term any more!).
单选题At that time I thought it ______ rain. [A] is going to [B] was going to [C] will
单选题The word "subjects" in paragraph 5 means ______.
单选题Questions 23 to 25 are based on the conversation you have just heard.
单选题John Lubbock, a British member of the Parliament, led to the first law to safeguard Britain"s heritage—the Ancient Monuments Bill. How did it happen?
By the late 1800s more and more people were visiting Stonehenge for a day out. Now a World Heritage Site owned by the Crown, it was, at the time, privately owned and neglected.
But the visitors left behind rubbish and leftover food. It encouraged rats that made holes at the stones" foundations, weakening them. One of the upright stones had already fallen over and one had broken in two. They also chipped pieces off the stones for souvenirs and carved pictures into them, says architectural critic Jonathan Glancey.
It was the same for other pre-historic remains, which were disappearing fast. Threats also included farmers and landowners as the ancient stones got in the way of working on the fields and were a free source of building materials.
Shocked and angry, Lubbock took up the fight. When he heard Britain"s largest ancient stone circle at Avebury in Wiltshire was up for sale in 1871 he persuaded its owners to sell it to him and the stone circle was saved.
"Lubbock aroused national attention for ancient monuments," says Glancey. "At the time places like Stonehenge were just seen as a collection of stones, ancient sites to get building materials."
"Lubbock knew they were the roots of British identity. He did for heritage what Darwin did for natural history."
But Lubbock couldn"t buy every threatened site. He knew laws were needed and tabled the Ancient Monuments Bill. It proposed government powers to take any pre-historic site under threat away from uncaring owners, a radical idea at the time.
For eight years he tried and failed to get the bill through parliament. Finally, in 1882, it was voted into law. It had, however, been watered down; people had to willingly give their ancient monuments to the government. But what it did do was plant the idea that the state could preserve Britain"s heritage better than private owners.
Pressure started to be put on the owners of sites like Stonehenge to take better care of them.
单选题
单选题
单选题
单选题{{B}}Text 2{{/B}}
Change is the principle--and the
process--that enables us to move on and upward growth and change, of continuous
improvement. To make meaningful progress, we need to consider one other aspect
of change as it is used only by human our thought. In the words of Madame, "The
voice of thought is so soft that it is easy to forget about it, but it is also
so clear that it is impossible to misunderstand it." Just as the
education of nerve is most important to the excellent athlete and education of
the mind is vital to the scholar, education of the thought is vital to the truly
highly effective person. Training and educating the thought,
however, requires even greater concentration, more balanced discipline, more
consistently honest living. It requires regular feasting on inspiring
literature, thinking noble thoughts and, above all, living in harmony with its
still small voice. Just as junk food and lack of exercise can
ruin an athlete's condition, those things that are not decent, crude, or
unhealthy can lead to an inner darkness and make us wonder "What is right and
wrong?" In the words of Dag Hammarskjold, You cannot play with
the animal in you without becoming wholly animal, play with falsehood without
losing your right to truth, play with cruelty without losing your sensitivity of
mind. He who wants to keep his garden tidy doesn't reserve a plot for
weeds. Once we are self-aware, we must choose purposes and
principles to live by; otherwise the hole will be filled, and we will lose our
self-awareness and become like groveling animals that live mainly for
survival. And there is no easy way in developing them. The Law
of the Harvest governs; we will always reap what we sow--no more, no less. I
believe that as we grow and develop, an increasingly educated thought will push
us along the path of personal freedom, security, wisdom, and power. Moving
upward requires us to learn, commit, and do on increasingly higher planes. To
keep progressing, we must learn, commit, and do--learn, commit, and do--and
learn, commit, and do again.
单选题
单选题It can be inferred from the passage that Seligman should be________.
单选题Although few would deny that it is better to be rich than poor, for some people the quest for money is so all-consuming that it extinguishes all other aspects of life. The cause of the urge to make enormous sums of money varies with the individual, but often money is a substitute for something a person's life lacks. To some, money means security. To some, it means power. To others, it means the possibility of love, and to a fourth group, it means competition and winning the game. A tremendous need for power is invariably the bottom line for those driven to make a lot of money. The bigger the pile, the more powerful they think they will feel. Parents and family background also influence a person's pursuit of money. Many people who grew up poor and then made a fortune live in fear that they will lose it. Others strive for money to compete with their wealthy, successful parents. Making money for its own sake can be addicting like high-stakes gambling. The more they earned, the bigger their appetite was. They paid great price for their insatiability for money in terms of their living quality. For example, their obsession with money-making renders them unable to enjoy what they have earned. Instead, they just work at such an intense pace and under such strenuous pressure that they totally neglected themselves. Hence the emergence of various kinds of psychological and physical problems, like impotence, insomnia, heart attacks and problems with a spouse or children.
单选题All of us have read thrilling stories in which the hero had only a limited and specified time to live. Sometimes it was as long as a year, sometimes as short as 24 hours. But always we were interested in discovering just how the doomed hero chose to spend his last days or his last hours. I speak, of course, of free men who have a choice, not condemned criminals whose sphere of activities is strictly delimited. Such stories set us thinking, wondering what we should do under similar circumstances. What events, what experiences, what associations should we crowd into those last hours as mortal beings, what regrets? Sometimes I have thought it would be an excellent role to live each day as if we should die tomorrow. Such an attitude would emphasize sharply the values of life. We should live each day with gentleness, vigor and a keenness of appreciation which are often lost when time stretches before us in the constant panorama of more days and months and years to come. There are those, of course, who would adopt the Epicurean motto of "Eat, drink, and be merry". But most people would be chastened by the certainty of impending death. In stories the doomed hero is usually saved at the last minute by some stroke of fortune, but almost always his sense of values is changed. He becomes more appreciative of the meaning of life and its permanent spiritual values. It has often been noted that those who live, or have lived, in the shadow of death bring a mellow sweetness to everything they do. Most of us, however, take life for granted. We know that one day we must die, but usually we picture that day as far in the future. When we are in buoyant health, death is all but unimaginable. We seldom think of it. The days stretch out in an endless vista. So we go about our petty tasks, hardly aware of our listless attitude toward life.
单选题
单选题WhatdowelearnaboutMichaelfromthisconversation?
