单选题{{B}}Text 2{{/B}}
A proven method for effective textbook
reading is the SQ3R method developed by Francis Robinson. The first step is to
survey (the S step) the chapter by reading the title, introduction, section
headings, summary and by studying any graphs, tables, illustrations or charts.
The purpose of this step is to get an overview of the chapter so that you will
know before you read what it will be about. In the second step (the Q step), for
each section you ask yourself questions such as "What do I already know about
this topic?" and "What do I want to know?" In this step you also take the
section heading and turn it into a question. This step gives you a purpose for
reading the section. The third step (the first of the 3 R's) is to read to find
the answer to your questions. Then at the end of each section, before going on
to the next section, you recite (the second of the 3 R's) the answers to the
questions that you formed in the question step. When you recite you should say
the information you want to learn out loud in your own words. The fifth step is
done after you have completed steps 2, 3 and 4 for each section. You review (the
last of the 3 R's) the entire chapter. The review is done much as the survey was
in the first step. As you review, hold a mental conversation with yourself as
you recite the information you selected as important to learn. The mental
conversation could take the form of asking and answering the questions fromed
from the headings or reading the summary, which lists the main ideas in the
chapter, and trying to fill in the details for each main
idea.
单选题The reason the painting of the house has not been looked on as an art form seems to be ______.
单选题
单选题
单选题The first massive electronic computers were______
单选题To understand how astrology works, we should first take a quick look at the sky. Although the stars are at enormous distances, they do indeed give the impression of being affixed to the inner surface of a great hollow sphere surrounding the earth. Ancient people, in fact, literally believed in the existence of such a celestial sphere. As the earth spins on its axis, the celestial sphere appears to turn about us each day, pivoting at points on a line with the earth’s axis of rotation. This daily turning of the sphere carries the stars around the sky, causing most of them to rise and set, but they, and constellations they define, maintain fixed patterns on the sphere, just as the continent of Australia maintains its shape on a spinning globe of the earth. Thus the stars were called fixed stars. The motion of the sun along the ecliptic is, of course, merely a reflection of the revolution of the earth around the sun, but the ancients believed the earth was fixed and the sun had an independent motion of its own, eastward among the stars. The glare of sunlight hides the stars in daytime, but the ancients were aware that the stars were up there even at night, and the slow eastward motion of the sun around the sky, at the rate of about thirty degrees each month, caused different stars to be visible at night at different times of the year. The moon, revolving around the earth each month, also has an independent motion in the sky. The moon, however changes it position relatively rapidly. Although it appears to rise and Set each day, as does nearly everything else in the sky, we can see the moon changing position during as short an interval as an hour or so. The moon’s path around the earth lies nearly in the same plane as the earth’s path around the sun, so the moon is never seen very far from the ecliptic in the sky. There are five other objects visible to the naked eye that also appear to move in respect to the fixed background of stars on the celestial sphere. These are the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. All of them revolve around the sun in nearly the same plane as the earth does. So they, like the moon, always appear near the ecliptic. Because we see the planets from the moving earth, however, they behave in a complicated way, with their apparent motions on the celestial sphere reflecting both their own independent motions around the sun and our motion as well.
单选题It has long been the subject of speculation among the police and criminologists: what would happen if all the officers who now spend so much of their time taking statements, profiling criminals and moving pieces of paper around were suddenly put on the streets? Crime figures released by London's Metropolitan Police this week provide the best answer yet. Following the bombings of July 7th and 21st, thousands of police officers materialised on London's pavements, many of them sporting brightly coloured jackets. Drawn from all over the city, they were assigned to guard potential targets such as railway stations. The police presence was especially heavy in the bombed boroughs: Camden (which was struck three times), Hammersnrith and Fulham, Lamheth, Tower Hamlets, Westminster and the City of London. The show of force did not just scare off terrorists. There was less crime in July than in May or June, which As unusual: the warmer month tends to bring out criminal tendencies, as windows are left open and alcohol is imbibed alfresco. But the chilling effect was much stronger in the six boroughs that were targeted by terrorists. There, overall crime was down by 12% compared with July 2004. In inner London as a whole, crime fell by 6%. But in outer London, where the blue line was thinner, it went up slightly. Simon Foy, who tracks such trends at the Metropolitan Police, says that crime fell particularly steeply on the days of the attacks, partly because of the overwhelming police presence and partly because "even criminals were watching their televisions". What is significant is that crime barely rose thereafter. That was a change from the aftermath of September 11th 2001, when crime quickly soared just about everywhere—possibly because officers were deployed only in the very centre of London. "The received wisdom among criminologists is that marginal changes in visible patrolling have little or no effect on crime," says Mike Hough, a criminologist at King's College London. July's experiment should put that argument to rest. Even if offenders do not make rational calculations about the odds of being caught—which was low both before and after the bombings--they will Be moved by a display of overwhelming force.
单选题
单选题The most critical time in the life of a human is the very beginning—the first hours after birth. Yet it has been only within the past few years that doctors have recognized that treating a newborn baby like a small child is not the best procedure. This is especially true of "high risk babies", a term applied to babies that are premature, underweight, or born with major organic defects. They need immediate, imaginative, intensive care and observation, not only for survival but also to help circumvent physical problems which may affect the infant for life. Out of this requirement has developed a new branch of medicine called neonatology, which is concerned with the first three months of life. Dozens of major hospitals throughout the United States have opened newborn intensive care units, directed by neonatologists and employing equipment and techniques devised specially for tiny patients. One of the greatest aids in these units is an "isolette"—an electronically equipped glass-enclosed incubator with portholes for sterile access to the baby. Inside the isolette, sensors placed on the infant make him look much like a miniature astronaut. The sensors automatically regulate and record the temperature, humidity, and oxygen in this "artificial womb", as well as signal change or trouble affecting its occupant. In hospitals with newborn intensive care unit, specialists are ready to use their skills as the need arises. They are alerted to pregnancies that may develop complications. For example, if a woman who is pregnant enters the hospital and is under the age of 18 or over the age of 40, is undernourished or obese, has diabetes, heart or kidney trouble, the neonatologists are advised. The neonatologist often attends the delivery of a baby with the obstetrician, and then rushes the newborn infant into his special care unit. There, within a few minutes, the baby is tested, examined thorougbly, and made ready for treatment or surgery if needed. The most common cause of infant deaths is pre-maturity. In some hospitals it is not unusual to find 8 or 9 "preemies" (premature infants) in the special care units at one time. In addition to the technical advances, the health of the infant depends on an ageless ingredient-love. Nurses are essential members of baby-caving teams. Their job is to rock, to feed, and to fondle the very small patients. Even at this early age, doctors find that lack of love has adverse physical and psychological effects. on the newborn babies. As the number of neonatologists and special care centers has increased, the survival rate for high-risk babies in the United States has risen from about 75 % a few years ago to an impressively high 90% today. Doctors think that the 90% could beincreased if the babies could be brought more quickly under the care of a neonatologist. In some hospitals, teams of doctors and nurses can respond to emergencies with portable isolettes which are carried by airplane, helicopter, or ambulance.
单选题Which of the following may serve as the best title of the passage?
单选题{{B}}Text 4{{/B}}
LAST month, America's National Law
Journal told its readers that "employment lawyers are warning lovestruck
co-workers to take precautions in the office before locking lips outside". The
advice came too late for Harry Stonecipher. The boss of Boeing was forced to
resign last weekend—for reasons that will strike many outsiders as absurd—after
his board were told of an affair that the 68-year-old married man had been
conducting with a female employee "who did not report directly to
him", Inevitably, as the week rolled on, details of the affair
rolled out. The other party was re2 ported to be Debra Peabody, who is unmarried
and has worked for Boeing for 25 years. The couple were said to have first got
together at Boeing's annual retreat at Palm Desert, California in January. After
that much of the affair must have been conducted from a distance: Mr.
Stonecipher's office is at Boeing's headquarters in Chicago; Ms Peabody runs the
firm's government-relations office in Washington, DC. They exchanged e-mails, it
seems, as office lovers tend to do these days, and therein probably lay Mr
Stonecipher's downfall Lewis Platt, Boeing's chairman, said that
Mr Stonecipher broke a company rule that says: "Employees will not engage in
conduct or activity that may raise questions as to the company's honesty,
impartiality, reputation or otherwise cause embarrassment to the company."
Having an affair with a fellow employee is not, of itself, against company
rules; causing embarrassment to Boeing is. It seems that the board judged that
the contents of the lovers' e-mails would have been bad for Boeing had they been
made public. Gone are the days when a board considered such matters none of its
business, as Citibank's did in 1991 when its boss, John Reed, became the talk of
Wail Street for having an affair with a stewardess on Citi's corporate
jet. At Boeing, a whistleblower is said to have forwarded the
messages to Mr Platt. In general, e-mails are encrypted and not accessible to
anyone who does not know the sender's password. But many firms install
software designed to search electronic communications for key words such as,
"sex" and "CEO". A study last year of 840 American firms by the American
Management Association found that 60% of them check external e-mails (incoming
and outgoing), while 27% scrutinize internal messages between employees.
Sweet nothings whispered by the water cooler may travel less far these days than
electronic billets doux. Boeing is particularly sensitive to
embarrassment at the moment. Mr. Stonecipher was recalled from retirement only
15 months ago, after the company's previous boss, Phil Condit, and its chief
financial officer, Michael Sears, had left in the wake of a scandal involving an
illegal job offer to a Pentagon official. Mr Stonecipher, a
crusty former number two at Boeing, was brought back specifically to raise the
company's ethical standards and to help it be seen in its main ( and affectedly
puritanical) market, in Washington, DC, as squeaky clean. Verbally
explicit extra-marital affairs are inconsistent with such a strategy, it seems,
though they are not yet enough to bring down future kings of England.
In corporate life, such affairs are hardly unusual. One survey found that
one-quarter of all long-term relationships start at work; another found that
over 40% of executives say they have been involved in an affair with a
colleague, and that in haft of these cases one or other party was married at the
time. Many a boss has married his assistant and lived happily ever after. Boeing
apparently used to accept this: Mr. Condit's fourth wife was a colleague before
they married.
单选题The result of research carried out by social scientists shows that
单选题For hundreds of millions of years, turtles have struggled out of the sea to lay their eggs on sandy beaches, long before there were nature documentaries to celebrate them, or GPS satellites and marine biologists to track them, or volunteers to hand-carry the hatchlings down to the water"s edge lest they become disoriented by headlights and crawl towards a motel parking lot instead. A formidable wall of bureaucracy has been erected to protect their prime nesting on the Atlantic coastlines. With all that attention paid to them, you"d think these creatures would at least have the gratitude not to go extinct.
But
Nature is indifferent to human notions of fairness
, and a report by the Fish and Wildlife Service showed a worrisome drop in the populations of several species of North Atlantic turtles, notably loggerheads, which can grow to as much as 400 pounds. The South Florida nesting population, the largest, has declined by 50% in the last decade, according to Elizabeth Griffin, a marine biologist with the environ-mental group Oceana. The figures prompted Oceana to petition the government to upgrade the level of protection for the North Atlantic loggerheads from "threatened" to "endangered"—meaning they are in danger of disappearing without additional help.
Which raises the obvious question: what else do these turtles want from us, anyway? It turns out, according to Griffin, that while we have done a good job of protecting the turtles for the weeks they spend on land (as egg-laying females, as eggs and as hatchlings), we have neglected the years they spend in the ocean. "The threat is from commercial fishing," says Griffin. Trawlers (which drag large nets through the water and along the ocean floor) and longline fishers (which can deploy thousands of hooks on lines that can stretch for miles) take a heavy toll on turtles.
Of course, like every other environmental issue today, this is playing out against the background of global warming and human interference with natural ecosystems. The narrow strips of beach on which the turtles lay their eggs are being squeezed on one side by development and on the other by the threat of rising sea levels as the oceans warm. Ultimately we must get a handle on those issues as well, or a creature that outlived the dinosaurs will meet its end at the hands of humans, leaving our descendants to wonder how creature so ugly could have won so much affection.
单选题Which of the following best describes the society about which David Donald wrote?______
单选题{{B}}Text 3{{/B}}
Most of the people who appear most
often and most gloriously in the history books are great conquerors and generals
and soldiers, whereas the people who really helped civilization forward are
often never mentioned at all. We do not know who first set a broken leg, or
launched a seaworthy boat, or calculated the length of the year, or manured a
field; but we know all about the killers and destroyers. People think a great
deal of them, so much so that on all the highest pillars in the great cities of
the world you will find the figure of a conqueror or a general or a soldier. And
I think most people believe that the greatest countries are those that have
beaten in battle the greatest number of other countries and ruled over them as
conquerors. It is just possible they are, but they are not the most civilized.
Animals fight; so do savages; hence to be good at fighting is to be good in the
way in which an animal or a savage is good, but it is not to be civilized. Even
being good at getting other people to fight for you and telling them how to do
it most efficiently—this, after all, is what conquerors and generals have
done—is not being civilized. People fight to settle quarrels.' Fighting means
killing, and civilized peoples ought to be able to find some way of settling
their disputes other than by seeing which side can kill off the greater number
of the other side, and then saying that that side which has killed most has worn
And not only has won, but, because it has won, has been in the right. For that
is what going to war means; it means saying that might is right.
That is what the story of mankind has on the whole been like. Even our own
age has fought the two greatest wars in history, in which millions of people
were killed or mutilated. And while today it is true that people do not fight
and kill each other in the streets—while, that is to say, we have got to the
stage of keeping the rules and behaving properly to each other in daily
life—nations and countries have not learnt to do this yet, and still behave like
savages. But we must not expect too much. After all, the race of
men has only just started. From the point of view of evolution, human beings are
very young children indeed, babies, in fact, of a few months old. Scientists
reckon that there has been life of some sort on the earth in the form of
jellyfish and that kind of creature for about twelve hundred million years; but
there have been men for only one million years, and there have been civilized
men for about eight thousand years at the outside. These figures are difficult
to grasp; so let us scale them down. Suppose that we reckon the whole past of
living creatures on the earth as one hundred years; then the whole past of man
works out at about one month, and during that month there have been
civilizations for between seven and eight hours. So you see there has been
little time to learn in, but there will be oceans of time in which to learn
better. Taking man's civilized past at about seven or eight hours, we may
estimate his future, that is to say, the whole period between now and when the
sun grows too cold to maintain life any longer on the earth, at about one
hundred thousand years. Thus mankind is only at the beginning of its civilized
life, and as I say, we must not expect too much. The past of man has been on the
whole a pretty beastly business, a business of fighting and bullying and gorging
and grabbing and hurting. We must not expect even civilized peoples not to have
done these things. All we can ask is that they will sometimes have done
something else.
单选题
单选题
单选题Even the Saudis--or rather, the small number of men who actually rule their troubled country--are giving ground in the struggle for women's rights. For sure, the recommendations (1) this week to Crown Prince Abdullah at the end of an (2) round of "national dialogue" concentrating on the role of women were fairly tame. in the reformers-versus-reactionaries (3) test of whether women should, be allowed to drive cars (at present they cannot do so in the kingdom, nor can they travel unaccompanied, by whatever (4) of motion), the king was merely asked to" (5) a body to study a public-transport system for women to facilitate mobility". (6) mention, of course, of the right to vote--but then that has been (7) to men too, though local elections, on an apparently universal franchise, are supposed to be held in October. In sum, it is a tortoise's progress. But the very fact of the debate happening at all is (8) --and hopeful. It is not just in Saudi Arabia that more rights for women are being demanded (9) across the whole of the Arab and Muslim world. The pushy Americans have made women's rights part of their appeal for greater democracy in (10) they now officially call the "broader Middle East", to include non-Arab Muslim countries such as Iran, Turkey and even Afghanistan. Many Arabs have cautioned the Americans against seeking to (11) their own values on societies with such different traditions and (12) . Many leading Muslims have (13) the culturally imperious Americans of seeking to (14) Islam. The (15) for more democracy in the Muslim world issued by leaders of the eight biggest industrial countries was watered down for fear of giving (16) . Yet, despite the Arabs' prickliness, the Americans have helped pep up a debate that is now bubbling fiercely in the Arab world, even (17) many Arab leaders, none of whom is directly elected by the people, are understandably (18) of reforms that could lead to their own toppling. Never before have women's rights in the Arab world been so (19) debated. That (20) is cause to rejoice.
单选题
单选题
