单选题热极津枯重证之人，可见( )(2007年第157题)

单选题表虚证的辨证要点是

单选题胁肋胀痛，厌食油腻厚味，苔黄腻，为A．脾胃湿热B．肝胆湿热C．痰湿内蕴D．胃火炽盛

单选题下列各项不属于燥邪的临床表现的是

单选题下列选项中，均主痛证的脉是( )(2010年第21题)

单选题神清，思维正常而吐字困难，或吐字不清晰，语言不流畅，称A．狂言B．独语C．呓语D．言謇

单选题开窍化痰与辟秽解毒结合应用的是下列哪个方剂

单选题下述哪项不是血热证的表现A．迫血妄行而出血B．月经量多而色淡C．身热面赤而发斑D．肌肤生疮疔疖痈

单选题黑色不主何病证A．血瘀B．肾虚C．水饮D．痰湿

单选题属于湿淫证特性的是

单选题两目干涩，视物昏花，甚则夜盲，多因( )(2006年第14题)

单选题A．心阴虚证B．心脾气虚证C．痰蒙心窍证D．心肝血虚证

单选题下列哪项不是脾肾阳虚的临床表现A．腰膝酸软B．耳呜耳聋C．五更泄泻D．失眠多梦E．面浮肢肿

单选题郑声的病机是

单选题《脉经》的作者是

单选题瘀；石；虫；痰等阻塞所致之“气闭”，最突出的表现是

单选题患者咳嗽气喘，痰稀色白，形寒肢冷，舌淡苔白，脉迟，属于( )(1992年第26题)

单选题痰少而黏，难于咯出者，应属( )(2007年第23题)

单选题发热，午后热甚，身热不扬，属于( )(2006年第19题)

单选题When it comes to suing doctors, Philadelphia is hardly the city of brotherly love. A combination of sprightly lawyers and sympathetic juries has made Philadelphia a hotspot for medical-malpractice lawsuits. Since 1995, Pennsylvania state courts have awarded an average of $ 2m in such cases, according to Jury Verdict Research, a survey firm. Some medical specialists have seen their malpractice insurance premiums nearly double over the past year. Obstetricians are now paying up to $104,000 a year to protect themselves. The insurance industry is largely to blame. Carol Golin, the Monitor's editor, argues that in the 1990s insurers tried to grab market share by offering artificially low rates (betting that any losses would be covered by gains on their investments). The stock-market correction, coupled with the large legal awards, has eroded the insurers' reserves. Three in Pennsylvania alone have gone bust. A few doctors--particularly older ones--will quit. The rest are adapting. Some are abandoning litigation-prone procedures, such as delivering babies. Others are moving parts of their practice to neighboring states where insurance rates are lower. Some from Pennsylvania have opened offices in New Jersey. New doctors may also be deterred from setting up shop in litigation havens, however prestigious. Despite a Republican president, tort reform has got nowhere at the federal level. Indeed doctors could get clobbered indirectly by a Patients' Bill of Rights, which would further expose managed care companies to lawsuits. This prospect has fuelled interest among doctors in Pennsylvania's new medical malpractice reform bill, which was signed into law on March 20th. It will, among other things, give doctors $ 40m of state funds to offset their insurance premiums, spread the payment of awards out over time and prohibit individuals from double dipping--that is, suing a doctor for damages that have already been paid by their health insurer. But will it really help? Randall Bovbjerg, a health policy expert at the Urban Institute, argues that the only proper way to slow down the litigation machine would be to limit the compensation for pain and suffering, so-called "non-monetary damages". Needless to say, a fixed cap on such awards is resisted by most trial lawyers. But Mr Bovbjerg reckons a more nuanced approach, with a sliding scale of payments based on well-defined measures of injury, is a better way forward. In the meantime, doctors and insurers are bracing themselves for a couple more rough years before the insurance cycle turns. Nobody disputes that hospital staff make mistakes: a 1999 Institute of Medicine report claimed that errors kill at least 44,000 patients a year. But there is little evidence that malpractice lawsuits on their own will solve the problem.