单选题Disastrous forest fires are quite often caused by simple carelessness: a dropped butt Uignites/U dead leaves.
单选题He gave his work to his friend to ______, because he found it hard to see his own mistakes.
单选题
单选题A cobweb glistening with dew seems as ______ as it is lovely.
A. frigid
B. fragile
C. strident
D. tedious
单选题The manufacturer was forced to return the money to the consumers under ______ of law.
单选题Perpetrators can and often manipulate the following BUT ( )
单选题The new secretary has written a remarkably ______ report only in a few pages but with all the details included.
单选题It can be inferred from the passage that the future of online visits will mostly depend on whether ______.
单选题Strict sanitary procedures formulated by our municipal government help to out-breaks of diseases.
单选题The author does discuss the following issue EXCEPT that ______.
单选题Handwriting analysis (graphology) circumvents the law by frying to determine an employee's traits (e. g. stability) according to some handwriting group stereotype to which he or she belongs. (Indeed, some graphologists have m little respect for the law and m much confidence in their stereotyping that they have proposed using the technique in lieu of court proceedings to identify and prosecute criminals!) The analysis works by comparing the speed, size, slant, form, pressure, layout, and continuity of an individual's handwriting with various patterns and typologies, and assimilating this person's script into these types. As a result the individual judged ceases to be an individual and becomes little more than a composite of traits. This end result differs little from judgments based on race, sex, religion, etc. Granted, no individual is totally unique. Any evaluation of character, or for that matter skills, turns, in some measure, on employing generic ideas about virtue, vice, and technical competence. Still, there is a human individuality which manifests itself in our imagination and in the innovative arguments we choose to advance. Standardized handwriting analysis is far less respectful of individuality in this latter sense than other modes of screening. Individuals who are asked to write a personal essay describing their qualifications in their own terms; and who are given an opportunity in an interview to describe their motivations in seeking a particular job retain far more of what makes them distinctive. This more personalized format gives the individual an opportunity to express unusual or provocative opinions the employer may not have previously considered. Upon reflection, the employer may think these comments so pertinent that s/he awards the job to this candidate. Handwriting analysis, though, is ostensibly purely formal. It does not provide the candidate with any opportunity to distinguish himself or herself in this substantive fashion. At best, graphology will yield some vague assessment such as "the candidate is highly creative". It is worth remembering what the driving force is behind graphological testing. Handwriting analysis, like automated telephone screening, is increasingly being used early in the hiring process because it purports to deliver salient, accurate information cheaply. Yet precisely because these techniques are standardized, the data has reduced value. Judgments about the precise relevance of some perceived character traits to a job are rarely straightforward. Good interviewers learn through training and through interaction itself to qualify previous judgments. Perhaps the candidate who fails to make eye contact has a guilty conscience (as it is standardly assumed). On the other hand, perhaps the candidate is a recent immigrant from a country where eye contact is considered rude. Alternate interpretations sometimes suggest themselves in a face-to-face encounter with individuals who are fully present in their living, acting, and speaking personhood. Handwriting analysis, done at a distance by an expert who has never even met the candidate, will not stimulate the evaluator's imagination in the way the in-person interview 6r personal essay might. On the contrary, the cheapness of the technique stems from its elimination of the important human activity of hypothesizing about the case at hand.
单选题The child was so {{U}}ingenuous{{/U}} that even when she knocked the television off its stand so that it was irreparably damaged, her parents thought her to be charming
单选题When travelling, you are advised to take travellers' checks, which
provide a secure ______ to carrying your money in cash.
A. substitute
B. selection
C. preference
D. alternative
单选题When he lived in that remote place, radio was the only means be had to keep ______ of current events in the country.
单选题
单选题All the ceremonies at the 2000 Olympic Games had a unique Australian flavor, ______ of their multicultural communities.
单选题(1) Gerald Feinberg, the Columbia University physicist, once went so far as to declare that "everything possible will eventually be accomplished." Well, that of course left only the impossible as the one thing remaining for daring intellectual adventurers to whittle away at Feinberg, for one, thought that "they"d succeed even there."
(2) It was a point worth considering. How many times in the past had certain things been said to be impossible, only to have it turn out shortly thereafter that the item in question had already been done or soon would be. What greater cliche was there in the history of science than the comic litany of false it-couldn"t-be-dones; the infamous case of Auguste Comte saying in 1844 that it would never be known what the stars were made of, followed in a few years by the spectroscope being applied to starlight to reveal the stars" chemical composition; or the case of Lord Rutherford, the man who discovered the structure of the atom, saying in 1933 mat dreams of controlled nuclear fission were "moonshine." And those weren"t even the worst examples. No, the huffiest of all it-couldn"t-be-done claims centered on the notion that human beings could actually fly, either at all, or across long distances, or to the moon, the stars, or wherever else.
(3) There had been so many embarrassments of this type that about mid-century Arthur C. Clarke came out with a guideline for avoiding them, which he termed Clarke"s Law: "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."
(4) Still, one had to admit there were lots of things left that were really and truly impossible, even if it took some ingenuity in coming up with a proper list of examples. Such as. "A camel cannot pass through the eye of a needle." (Well, unless of course it was a very large needle.) On "It is impossible for a door to be simultaneously open and closed." (Well, unless of course it was a revolving door.)
(5) Indeed, watertight examples of the really and truly impossible were so exceptionally hard to come by that paradigm cases turned out to be either trivial or absurd. "I know I will never play the piano like Vladimir Horowitz," offered Milton Rothman, a physicist, "no matter how hard I try". Or, from Scott Lankford, a mountaineer "Everest on roller skates."
单选题
单选题{{B}}Directions:{{/B}} There are 5 reading passages in this part. Each
passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them
there are four choices marked A, B, C, and D. You should decide on the best
choice and mark your answer on the ANSWER SHEET by blackening the corresponding
letter in the brackets.
No one can be a great thinker who does
not realize that as a thinker it is his first duty to follow his intellect to
whatever conclusions it may lead. Truth gains more even by the errors of one
who, with due study and preparation, thinks for himself, than by the true
opinions of those who only hold them because they do not suffer themselves to
think. Not that it is solely, or chiefly, to form great thinkers that freedom of
thinking is required. On the contrary, it is as much or even more indispensable
to enable average human beings to attain the mental stature which they are
capable of. There have been, and may again be, great individual thinkers in a
general atmosphere of mental slavery. But there never has been, nor ever will
be, in that atmosphere an intellectually active people. Where any people has
made a temporary approach to such a character, it has been because the dread of
heterodox speculation was for a time suspended. Where there is a tacit
convention that principles are not to be disputed; where the discussion of the
greatest questions which can occupy humanity is considered to be closed, we
cannot hope to find that generally high scale of mental activity which has made
some periods of history so remarkable. Never when controversy avoided the
subjects which are large and important enough to kindle enthusiasm was the mind
of a people stirred up from its foundations and the impulse given which raised
even persons of the most ordinary intellect to something of the dignity of
thinking beings. He who knows only his own side of the case
knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to
refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite
side; if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for
preferring either opinion. The rational position for him would be suspension of
judgment, and unless he contents himself with that, he is either led by
authority, or adopts, like the generality of the world, the side to which he
feels the most inclination. Nor is it enough that he should hear the arguments
of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and
accompanied by what they offer as refutations. That is not the way to do
justice to the arguments, or bring them into real contact with his own mind. He
must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them; who defend
them in earnest, and do their very utmost for them. He must know them in their
most plausible and persuasive form: he must feel the whole force of the
difficulty which the true view of the subject has to encounter and dispose of;
else he will never really possess himself of the portion of truth which meets
and removes that difficulty. Ninety-nine in a hundred of what are called
educated men are in this condition; even of those who can argue fluently for
their opinions. Their conclusion may be true, but it might be false for anything
they know: they have never thrown themselves into the mental position of those
who think differently from them and considered what such persons may have to
say; and consequently they do not, in any proper sense of the word, know the
doctrines which they themselves profess. They do not know those parts of it
which explain and justify the remainder; the considerations which show that a
fact which seemingly conflicts with another is reconcilable with it, or that, of
two apparently strong reasons, one and not the other ought to be
preferred.
单选题Capital (inflows) will also (tend to) increase the international value of the dollar, (make) it more difficult to sell U.S. (exports).
