选择题啤酒 属于哪种外来词？ （ ）

选择题连词 其次 表示的关系是（ ）

选择题构词方式看 推广 属于（ ）

选择题看到自己 de 球队赢了， 他大声 de 喊起来

选择题下列哪组中两个词都是离合词？ （ ）

填空题我们渔民 是 ________ 短语， 我们的渔民 是 ________ 短语

填空题汉语辅音 ng 是舌面后、 浊音、 ________ 音

填空题连词 跟、 同、 和、 与 是表示 ________ 关系

填空题音同、 义同而形不同的字是 ________

填空题颐 字共有 13 画， 第七画是 ________

填空题东汉许慎的 ________ 把 9353 个汉字归为 540 部

填空题复韵母 un 的韵腹是 ________

改错题他事先没有充分调查研究， 以至得出了错误的结论

改错题她满含微笑， 脸上现出心慰的表情

改错题先生真知灼见， 我等甘败下风

阅读理解Directions: There are 7 passages in this section. Eachpassage is followed by some questions or unfinishedstatements. For each of them there are four choices markedA, B, C, and D. You should decide on the best choice.Passage 7We can make mistakes at any age. Some mistakes we make areabout money, but most mistakes are about people. “DidJerry really care when I broke up with Helen?” “When Igot that great job, did Jim really feel good about it, asa friend? Or did he envy my luck?” “And Paul—whydidn’ t I pick up that he was friendly just because I hada car?” When we look back, doubts like these can make usfeel bad. But when we look back, it’ s too late.Why do we go wrong about our friends — or our enemies?Sometimes what people say hides their real meaning. And ifwe don’ t really listen, we miss the feeling behind thewords. Suppose someone tells you, “You’ re a lucky dog. ”Is he really on your side? If he says, “You’ re a luckyguy” or “You’ re a lucky gal, ” that’ s being friendly.But “lucky dog” ? There’ s a bit of envy in those words.Maybe he doesn’ t see it himself. But bringing in the“dog” bit puts you down a little. What he may be sayingis that he doesn’ t think you deserve your luck.“Just think of all the things you have to be thankfulfor” is another noise that says one thing and meansanother. It could mean that the speaker is trying to getyou to see your problem as part of your life as a whole.But is he? Wrapped up in this phrase is the thought thatyour problem isn’ t important. It’ s telling you to thinkof all the starving people in the world when you haven’ tgot a date for Saturday night.How can you tell the real meaning behind someone’ s words?One way is to take a good look at the person talking. Dohis words fit the way he looks? Does what he says squarewith the tone of voice? His posture? The look in his eyes?Stop and think. The minute you spend thinking about thereal meaning of what people say to you may save anothermistake.

阅读理解Directions: There are 7 passages in this section. Eachpassage is followed by some questions or unfinishedstatements. For each of them there are four choices markedA, B, C, and D. You should decide on the best choice.Passage 4For centuries, explorers have risked their lives venturinginto the unknown for reasons that were to varying degreeseconomic and nationalistic. Columbus went west to look forbetter trade routes to the Orient and to promote thegreater glory of Spain. Lewis and Clark journeyed into theAmerican wilderness to find out what the U. S. had acquiredwhen it purchased Louisiana, and the Apollo astronautsrocketed to the moon in a dramatic show of technologicalmuscle during the cold war.Although their missions blended commercial and political-military imperatives, the explorers involved allaccomplished some significant science simply by goingwhere no scientists had gone before.Today Mars loomsas humanity’ s next great terra incognita.And with doubtful prospects for a short-term financialreturn, with the cold war a rapidly fading memory and amida growing emphasis on international cooperation in largespace ventures, it is clear that imperatives other thanprofits or nationalism will have to compel human beings toleave their tracks on the planet’ s reddish surface. Couldit be that science, which has long played a minor role inexploration, is at last destined to take a leading role?The question naturally invites a couple of others: Arethere experiments that only humans could do on Mars? Couldthose experiments provide insights profound enough tojustify the expense of sending people acrossinterplanetary space?With Mars the scientific stakes are arguably higher thanthey have ever been. The issue of whether life everexisted on the planet, and whether it persists to thisday, has been highlighted by mounting evidence that theRed Planet once had abundant stable, liquid water and bythe continuing controversy over suggestions that bacterialfossils rode to Earth on a meteoritefrom valuable dataabout the range of conditions under which a planet cangenerate the complex chemistry that leads to life. If itcould be established that life arose independently on Marsand Earth, the finding would provide the first concreteclues in one of the deepest mysteries in all of science:the prevalence of life in the universe.

阅读理解These days, anthropologists get remarkably nervous when they discuss culture—which is surprising, on the free of it, since the anthropology of culture is something of a success story. While other venerable concepts have mostly faded out of the social science discourse, even a postmodernist can talk unselfconsciously about culture. Indeed, culture is now more fashionable than ever. Other disciplines have taker it up, and a new specialty, cultural studies, is devoted entirely to it.【】Until very recently, there was also a high level of consensus on the subject. Even today a list of hypotheses about culture could be drawn up which most anthropologists would happily check off. First of all, culture is not a matter of race. It is learned, not carried in our genes. Second, this common human culture has advanced. We are talking here of the very long term, and progress has no doubt been uneven and liable to setbacks, but irreversible technical advances have been logged at an accelerating tempo. Technical progress can be measured, and its effects traced in the spread and growth of the human population, as well as in the development of increasingly large-scale and complex social systems. This point may be more grudgingly conceded, and only with qualification that what some might welcome as a new dawn may be a catastrophe for others. Third, there is general agreement about what culture involves in the sense in which most American cultural anthropologists have used the term, writing about Kwakiutl culture, or even American culture, rather than a global civilization. Culture is here essentially a matter of ideas and values, a collective cast of mind. The ideas and values, the cosmology, morality, and aesthetics, are expressed in symbols, and so—if the medium is the message —culture could be described as a symbolic system. American anthropologist; also tend to emphasize that these symbols, ideas, and values appear in an almost infinitely variable range of forms. At one level, this is an empirical proposition. However, a thoroughgoing philosophical relativism is often adduced from the observation that not only customs but also values are culturally variables. It seems to follow that there are no generally valid standards by which cultural principles and practices can be judged, it is this conception of culture which has become common currency, and not only in America. The anthropologists naturally welcomed the popularization of their ideas, which, they believe, could only foster greater tolerance, but they still expected to be acknowledged as the academic experts on the subject. However, although everyone is now talking about culture, they do not look to the anthropologists for guidance. This can be hard to take. “Anthropologists have been doing a lot of complaining that they are being ignored by the new academic specializations in culture, such as cultural studies, and by both academic and extra-academic manifestations of ‘ multiculturalism’ . Write the anthropologist Terence Turner, “Most of us have been sitting around like so many disconsolate intellectual wallflowers, waiting to be asked to impart our higher wisdom, and more than a little resentful that the invitations never come. ”

阅读理解Read the following passages carefully and choose one best answer for each question in passage 1, 2 and 3, and answer the questions in passage 4 based on your understanding of the passage.(3) Of the great variety of opinions concerning “marriage for money” , the following three are important with reference to the development of the importance of money. Marriages based exclusively upon economic motives have not only existed in all periods and at all stages of development, but are particularly common among primitive groups and conditions where they do not cause any offence at all. The disparagement of personal dignity that nowadays arises in every marriage that is not based on personal affection so that a sense of decency requires the concealment of economic motives does not exist in simpler cultures. The reason for this development is that increasing individualization makes it increasingly contradictory and discreditable to enter into purely individual relationships for other than purely individual reasons. For nowadays the choice of a partner in marriage is no longer determined by social motives (though regard for the offspring may be considered to be such a motive) , in so far as society does not insist upon the couple’ s equal social status a condition, however, that provides a great deal of latitude and only rarely leads to conflicts between individual and social interests. In a quite undifferentiated society it may be relatively irrelevant who marries whom, irrelevant not only for the mutual relationship of the couple but also for the offspring. This is because where the constitutions, state of health temperament, internal and external forms of life and orientations are largely the same within the group, the chance that the children will turn out well depends less upon whether the parents agree and complement each other than it does in highly differentiated society. It therefore seems quite natural and expedient that the choice of the partner should be determined by reasons other than purely individual affection. Yet personal attraction should be decisive in a highly individualized society where a harmonious relationship between two individuals becomes increasingly rare. The declining frequency of marriage which is to be found everywhere in highly civilized cultural circumstances is undoubtedly due, in part, to the fact that highly differentiated people in general have difficulty in finding a completely sympathetic complement to themselves. Yet we do not possess any other criterion and indication for the advisability of marriage except mutual instinctive attraction. But, happiness is a purely personal matter, decided upon entirely by the couple themselves, and there would be no compelling reason for the official insistence on at least pretending love may be misleading particularly in the higher strata, whose complicated circumstances often retard the growth of the purest instincts no matter how much other conditions may affect the final results, it remains true that, with reference to procreation, love is decidedly superior to money as a factor selection. In fact, in this respect, it is the only right and proper thing. Marriage for money directly creates a situation of panmixia the indiscriminate pairing regardless of individual qualities a condition that biology has demonstrated to be the cause of the most direct and detrimental degeneration of the human species. In the case of marriage for money, the union of a couple is determined by a factor that has absolutely nothing to do with racial appropriateness just as the regard for money often enough keeps apart a couple who really belong together and it should be considered as a factor in degeneration to the same extent to which the undoubted differentiation of individuals makes selection by personal attraction more and more important. This case too illustrates once more that the increasing individualization within society renders money increasingly unsuitable as a mediator of purely individual relationships.

阅读理解Directions: In this section there are reading passages followed by multiple-choice questions. Read the passages and then mark your answers on your answer sheet.Passage BA cold wind soothed the faces of the sweaty men huddled on the muddy field. The team stared at the goat line and focus on game-ending, season-defining play in front of them. Dusty air fitted their lungs with each deep heave they mustered.For almost two hours the men had battled their opponents on the barren football field. Joe, the center, could see the coach describing the play to a younger player. He was one of the grunts, a lineman, big and tall and eager to push open gaps for the backs. The underclassman’ s labored jog back to the huddle mirrored every man’ s fatigue.The quarterback confirmed the play and articulated it to his team. Joe saw his mouth move but could not hear the words; nonetheless, he knew his blocking assignment. The hiss of the crowd muffled all sound on the field. Suddenly, Joe picked a voice out of the din, and turned his attention to his good friend Mark. “This is it guys, ” Mark was yelling. “We’ ve been practicing for four months this season and for three more years before that. It’ s time we score and take home a win. Let’ s get it done! ” They all clasped hands to break the huddle and returned to their individual concentration.Time seemed to drag as the team marched back to the line of scrimmage. Joe glared at his opponents, pleased by the heavy clouds of vapor billowing from their mouths. Exhaustion was written on their faces and in their twitchy movements on the line. He turned his head toward the place in which he wanted to force a gap, then to the defensive end who stood fast which his hands on his knees, gaze fixed on the ground. Joe smiled inwardly: he knew his team had beaten the other with physical play and superior endurance. Time froze as he prepared to snap the ball.Joe leaned over carefully and clutched the moist leather ball. His teammates cautiously took their places right and left, lining up as in countless practice drills, in perfect order. Like clockwork, too, was each man’ s thorough examination of the opposing force, scanning back and forth for a gap or a weak player, feeling the opponents’ stares in return. Joe felt the quarterback crouch behind him. The passer’ s booming voice still did not register with Joe, but instinct told him what he needed to know. Three staccato hikes later, he snapped 45 the ball with speed and hurled himself towards the first defender.Joe felt the crunch of pads and brought his forearm under the other man’ s shoulder pads. Lifting with his arms and legs, he threw the lesser player onto his back. The meager lineman lay stunned for a moment, which greatly amused Joe, assuming the two yards he had sent his man back was more than enough to free the rusher to enter the end zone. This lucid moment lasted but a split second before Joe again lunged toward an upright opponent.Joe turned abruptly at the sound of a whistle and strained to find the scoring rusher. Something was wrong. Joe’ s teammates stood stunned, staring at the pile of defensive players who had fallen on their 60 running back. Referees began pulling men off the heap. With only a few men left on the ground, Joe could see the ball still in the backfield, and in the arms of an opponent. He heard his coach from the sideline: “Fumble? Are you kidding me? I can’ t believe you guys! ”His men had turned over possession of the hall, and time ran out on the game. “We had them beat, you know, ” Mark hissed to Joe as they walked slowly off the field. “They were dead tired. We should have 70 won the game. ” Their one chance was gone and now they had to endure the other team’ s celebration on the field. Joe’ s team never liked losing, but having come so close to a victory that day meant their last-minute defeat would, be especially disappointing.