单选题
{{B}}Northern Territory{{/B}} It was 3:45 in
the morning when the vote was finally taken. After six months of arguing and
final 16 hours of hot parliamentary debates, Australia's Northern Territory
became the first legal authority in the world to allow doctors to take the lives
of incur able ill patients who wish to die. The measure passed by the convincing
vote of 15 to 10. Almost immediately word flashed on the Internet and was picked
up, half a world away, by John Hofsess, executive director of the Right to Die
Society of Canada. He sent it on via the group's on-line service, Death NET.
Says Hofsess: "We posted bulletins all day long, because of course this isn't
just something that happened in Australia. It's world history."
The full import may take a while to sink in. The NT Rights of the
Terminally Ill law has left physicians and citizens alike trying to deal with
its moral and practical implications. Some have breathed sighs of relief,
others, including churches, right-to-life groups and the Australian Medical
Association bitterly attacked the bill and the haste of its passage. But the
tide is unlikely to turn back. In Australia—where an aging population,
life—extending technology and changing community attitudes have all played their
part-other states are going to consider making a similar law to deal with
euthanasia. In the US and Canada, where the right-to-die movement is gathering
strength, observers are waiting for the dominoes to start falling.
Under the new Northern Territory law, an adult patient can request
death—probably by a deadly injection or pill—to put an end to suffering. The
patient must be diagnosed as terminally ill by two doctors. After a "cooling
off" period of seven days, the patient can sign a certificate of request. After
48 hours the wish for death can be met. "I'm not afraid of dying from a
spiritual point of view, but what I was afraid of was how I'd go, because I've
watched people die in the hospital fighting for oxygen and clawing at their
masks, "said Lloyd Nickson, a 54-year-old Darwin resident suffering from lung
cancer.
单选题Poor health and lack of money may be both to educational progress roadblocks. A. restraints B. stains C. scarcities D. barriers
单选题I am not sure whether I can gain any profit from the investment, so I can't make a (n) {{U}}definite{{/U}} promise to help you.
单选题What did he do all this for?
单选题The Beginning of American Literature
America has always been a land of beginnings. After Europeans "discovered" America in the fifteenth century, the mysterious New World became for many people a genuine hope of a new life, an escape from poverty and persecution, a chance to start again. We can say that, as a nation, America begins with that hope. When, however, does American literature begin?
American literature begins with American experiences. Long before the first colonists arrived, before Christopher Columbus, before the Northmen who "found" America about the year 1000, native Americans lived here. Each tribe"s literature was tightly woven into the fabric of daily life and reflected the unmistakably American experience of linking with the land. Another kind of experience, one filled with fear and excitement, found its expression in the reports that Columbus and other explorers sent home in Spain, French and English. In addition, the journals of the people who lived and died in the New England wilderness tell unforgettable tales of hard and sometimes heartbreaking experiences of those early years.
Experience, then, is the key to early American literature. The New World provided a great variety of experiences, and these experiences demanded a wide variety of expressions by an even wider variety of early American writers. These writers included John Smith, who spent only two-and-a-haft year on the American continent. They included Jonathan Edwards and William Byrd, who thought of themselves as British subjects, never suspecting a revolution that would create a United States of America with a literature of its own. American Indians, explorers, Puritan ministers, frontier wives, plantation owners—they are all the creators of the first American literature.
单选题Who Came First, the Chicken or the Egg ? I just mailed the chicken and the egg, each in its own separate packaging, and kept careful track of when each shipment was sent from a post office in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and when it later arrived at its intended destination in New York City. In mailing the chicken, I was careful to adhere to the restrictions described in the American Postal Service's Domestic Mail Manual 57, as updated on April 3, 2003. This, the most recent, version of the Manual states that: "Adult chickens must be sent by Express Mail. The containers used must pass the standards in International Safe Transit Association Test Procedure IA; be strong enough to endure normal handling; and ensure enough air for the chickens in transit... The number of birds must not be more than 1he container's limit. " I mailed the chicken in a wooden box got from a colleague who does research with birds. Then, I mailed the egg in standard packaging obtained through an industrial supplier. It's quite simple. I posted both the chicken and the egg at 9. 40 am, on a Monday morning, from the Harvard Square post office, in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The staff there told me that this was the first chicken anyone had mailed from there in recent memory, and perhaps ever. They handled both the chicken and the egg skillfully and politely. The intended destination for both packages was the James A. Farley General Post Office, which is located in Manhattan right next to the Penn Station train terminal. I took the subway from the Harvard Square to the Boston train station, and from there boarded a train to New York City, a distance of about 320 kilometers, arriving lhat afternoon at Penn Station. I immediately went to the post office, to await the arrivals of the chicken and the egg. The James A. Farley General Post Office is open 24 hours a day, so I was able to wait there until both items arrived. I inquired once per hour for both the chicken and the egg. That day, Monday, neither the chicken nor the egg arrived. The next day, Tuesday, neither the chicken nor the egg arrived. The chicken arrived at 10:31 am, Wednesday. The staff at the post office told me that this was the first chicken anyone had mailed to the post office in recent memory, and perhaps ever. The egg arrived that same day, at 9. 37pm, 11 hours after the chicken. Based on experiment data, it's now quite clear that the chicken came first, the egg second.
单选题The next morning she told us that the last question didn't depart till well after midnight. A. go B. leave C. come D. appear
单选题The story was
touching
.
单选题The project required ten years of
diligent
research.
单选题Oil and Economy
Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979— 1980, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere, could push the price higher still in the short term.
Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (inconstant prices) rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973. The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a lull year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25%~0.5% of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand, oil-importing emerging economies—to which heavy industry has shifted—have become more energy-intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed.
One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The Economist"s commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%, and in 1979 by almost 30%.
单选题Seeing the World Centuries Ago If you enjoy looking through travel books by such familiar authors as Arthur Frommer or Eugene Fodor, it will not surprise you to learn that travel writing has a long and venerable history. Almost from the earliest annals of recorded time individuals have found ready audiences for their accounts of journeys to strange and exotic locales. One of the earliest travel writers, a Greek geographer and historian named Strabo, lived around the time of Christ. Though Strabo is known to have traveled from east of the Black Seawest to Italy and as far south as Ethiopia, he also used details gleaned from other writers to extend and enliven his accounts. His multivolumed work Geography provides the only surviving account of the cities, peoples, customs, and geographical peculiarities of the whole known world of his time. Two other classic travel writers, the Italian Marco Polo and the Moroccan Ibn Battutah, lived in roughly the same time period. Marco Polo traveled to China with his father and uncle in about A. D. 1275 and remained there 16 or 17 years, visiting several other countries during his travels. When Marco returned to Italy he dictated his memoirs, including stories he had heard from others, to a scribe, with the resulting book [[ millione being an instant success. Though difficult to attest to the accuracy of all he says, Marco's book impelled Europeans to begin their great voyages of exploration. Ibn Battutah's interest in travel began on his required Muslim journey to Mecca in 1325, and during his lifetime he journeyed through all the countries where Islam held sway. His travel book the Rihlah is a personalized account of desert journeys, court intrigues, and even the effect of the Black Death in the various lands he visited. In almost 30 years of traveling it is estimated that Ibn Battutah covered more than 75,000 miles.
单选题We should never satisfy ourselves with what we have learned.A. convinceB. contentC. comfortD. benefit
单选题Scotland: A Land of Wisdom In the 1740s, the famous French philosopher Voltaire said, "We look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilization. " That's not a bad advertisement for any country when it comes to attracting people to search for a first-class education. According to the American author Arthur Herman, the Scots invented the modern world itself. He argues that Scottish thinkers and intellectuals worked out many of the most important ideas on which modern life depends—everything from the scientific method to market economics. Their ideas did not just spread among intellectuals, but to those people in business, government and the sciences who actually shaped the Western world. It all started during the period that historians call the Scottish Enlightenment (启蒙运动), which is usually seen as taking place between the years 1740 and 1800. Before that, philosophy was mainly concerned with religion. For the thinkers of the Scottish Enlightenment, the proper study of humanity was mankind itself. Their reasoning was practical. For the philosopher David Hume, humanity was the right subject for philosophy because we can examine human behavior and so find real evidence of how people think and feel. And from that we can make judgments about the societies we live in and make concrete suggestions about how they can be improved, for universal benefit. Hume's enquiry into the nature of knowledge laid the foundations for the scientific method-the pursuit of truth through experiment. His friend and fellow resident of Edinburgh, Adam Smith, famously applied the study of mankind to the ways in which mankind does business. Trade, he argued, was a form of information. In pursuing our own interests through trading in markets, we all come to benefit each other. Smith's idea has dominated modern views of economics. It also has wide applications. He was one of the philosophers to point out that nations can become rich, free and powerful through peace, trade and invention. Although the Scottish Enlightenment ended a long time ago, the ideas which evolved at that time still underpin(构成……的基础) our theories of human exchange and enquiry. It also exists in Scotland itself in an educational tradition that combines academic excellence with orientation (方向).
单选题The director was Ucritical of/U the way we were doing the work.
单选题According to the passage, which of the following is NOT true of the football game?
单选题Australia is one of the biggest winners from globalization.
单选题Clearly, he will win the game.A. LikelyB. PossibleC. ObviouslyD. Strangely
单选题He talks tough but has a {{U}}tender{{/U}} heart.
A. heavy
B. strong
C. kind
D. wild
单选题She is a
highly
successful teacher.
单选题
Why So Many Children
In many of the developing countries in Africa and Asia, the population is
growing fast. The reason for this is simple: Women in these countries have a
high birth rate--from 3.0 to 7.0 children per woman. The majority of these women
are poor, without the food or resources to care for their families. Why do they
have so many children? Why don't they limit the size of their families? The
answer may be that they often have no choice. There are several reasons for
this. One reason is economic. In a traditional agricultural economy, large
families are helpful. Having more children means having more workers in the
fields and someone to take care of the parents in old age. In an industrial
economy, the situation is different. Many children do not help a family;
Instead, they are an expense. Thus, industrialization has generally brought down
the birth rate. This was the case in Italy, which was industrialized quite
recently and rapidly. In the early part of the twentieth century, Italy was a
poor, largely agricultural country with a high birth rate. After World War Ⅱ,
Italy's economy was rapidly modernized and industrialized. By the end of the
century, the birth rate had dropped to 1.3 children per woman, the world's
lowest. However, the economy is not the only important factor
that influences birth rate. Saudi Arabia, for example, does not have an
agriculture-based economy, and it has one of the highest per capita incomes in
the world. Nevertheless, it also has a very high birth rate (7.0). Mexico and
Indonesia, on the other hand, are poor countries, with largely agricultural
economies, but they have recently reduced their population growth.
Clearly, other factors are involved. The most important of these is the
condition of women. A high birth rate almost always goes together with lack of
education and low status for women. This would explain the high birth rate of
Saudi Arabia. There, the traditional culture gives women little education or
independence and few possibilities outside the home. On the other hand, the
improved condition of women in Mexico, Thailand, and Indonesia explains the
decline in birth rates in these countries. Their governments have taken measures
to provide more education and opportunities for women. Another
key factor in the birth rate is birth control. Women may want to limit their
families but have no way to do so. In countries where governments have made
birth control easily available and inexpensive, birth rates have gone down. This
is the case in Singapore, Sri Lanka, and India, as well as in Indonesia,
Thailand, Mexico, and Brazil. In these countries, women have also been provided
with health care and help in planning their families. These
trends show that an effective program to reduce population growth does not have
to depend on better economic conditions. It can be effective if it aims to help
women and meet their needs. Only then, in fact, does it have any real chance of
success.