单选题Passage One
单选题
单选题A.Itwasoutoforder.B.Itwascutoffbythephonecompany.C.Itwasconnectedtothewrongtelephoneline.D.Itwastakenawaybysomeoneelse.
单选题There are three aspects of the __________ to the epidemic in Britain that make people terribly uneasy.
单选题A) functional C) precious B) beneficial D) sensible
单选题The reason why college sports players pop the jerseys is because ______.
单选题
{{B}}Passage OneQuestions 26 to 28 are based on
the passage you have just heard.{{/B}}
单选题[此试题无题干]
单选题Out of________or out of interest, people go back to school for the common goal-to improve themselves.
单选题
单选题
单选题According to scientists, ______.
单选题Matt mason, as director of the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University has seen the future of our kitchens. Mason likes thinking (67) how machines can make our lives easier by taking (68) the tasks, like mopping, and cleaning, which we (69) . When it comes to the kitchen, he's (70) that within just a few decades, robots will (71) it by doing most of the (72) work and freeing us to sit back and (73) . "Right now we think of the kitchen (74) a place for chores," says Mason. "But maybe we're in the (75) of discovering it as a place we can enjoy." So (76) you really, really love to clean, you won't have to. The (77) has already begun. Recently, iRobot, the company that gave us the Roomba vacuum, invented Scooba--a robot that not only (78) but also wet-scrubs and dries floors all at (79) . The automatic floor cleaners of the future could (80) many different forms, explains Dan Kafa, president of Robotics Trends, which tracks (81) in automation. His speculation(想象) is that a floor-cleaning system is (82) into the wall and blows debris (碎片) to a part of the room where it's (83) up by a vacuum. Then the system sprays the (84) with a kind of solution, and it's mopped up by an arm with a sponge attached. "This is (85) speculation, of course," Kara admits, "but you could (86) it to come on at 3 a.m. , and it would just wet-mop the floor for you./
单选题The Neanderthals have larger housing brains than modem human beings because ______.
单选题
Organic farmers had fought to prevent
genetically-engineered crops from being {{U}}(67) {{/U}}organic, and it
could {{U}}(68) {{/U}} for them. Plants genetically {{U}}(69)
{{/U}} to resist insects and other pests {{U}}(70) {{/U}} about
15-percent of United States crop production, but it has become a {{U}}(71)
{{/U}} 15-percent. Several European countries are refusing to {{U}}(72)
{{/U}} genetically-engineered crops from the United States. Jim Skiff,
president of the Illinois-based company US Soy, says his company will not grow
crops with genetically modified organisms, known as GMO for short.
But the biotechnology industry is fighting back. Here's an advertisement
produced by the Washington-based Council for Biotechnology Information. The
biotech industry received a(n) {{U}}(73) {{/U}} in April, {{U}}(74)
{{/U}} a National Academy of Sciences report {{U}}(75) {{/U}} that
GMO crops appear to be safe. GMO supporters called the report proof
{{U}}(76) {{/U}}fears of these crops are {{U}}(77) {{/U}} ,
while critics called the report proof that the {{U}}(78) {{/U}} risk of
GMO crops are not {{U}}(79) {{/U}} known. Some companies
are avoiding GMO crops in their products just to {{U}}(80) {{/U}} the
genetic-food fight {{U}}(81) {{/U}} . Jim Schillinger of Iowa-based
Whole Soy says his {{U}}(82) {{/U}} of soy-based foods will not include
genetically-engineered beans. Agriculture officials in the Midwest United States
say it appears farmers are planting fewer {{U}}(83) {{/U}}of GMO
soybeans and corn this year, though they say this is probably a {{U}}(84)
{{/U}} situation until the controversy {{U}}(85) {{/U}} A survey
conducted by the Food Marketing Institute suggests 63-percent of American
{{U}}(86) {{/U}} are likely to buy genetically-engineered foods. That is
down from 77-percent four years ago.
单选题{{B}}Passage One{{/B}}
Do we need laws that prevent us from
running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting
(禁止) the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known
to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse
than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let's pass a
law dosing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let's put an end once
and for all to the disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently
suffer -- alcoholism(酗酒)。 But wait. We've already tried that.
For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the
United States. They were shut down -- abolished by an amendment (修正案), the
Volstead Act. After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more
manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxication liquors." Without any
more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could
they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from
drunkenness and alcoholism (酒精中毒). It was all very logical. And yet prohibition
of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why? Because, law or no
law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to
take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just
because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers(走私犯) made it easy
to buy an illegal drink -- or two or three. They smuggled millions of gallons of
the illegal beverages (饮料) across the Canadian and Mexican Borders. Drinkers
were lucky to know of an illegal bar that served Mexican or Canadian liquor.
Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition.
Instead people drank more alcohol than ever -- often poisoned alcohol.
On December 5, 1933, they removed prohibition by approving the 21st
Amendment to the Constitution.
单选题
单选题[此试题无题干]
单选题
单选题