单选题Frankenstein was created by the wife of______.
单选题{{B}}TEXT D{{/B}} Two conflicts convinced
Western countries that they dared not reduce their forces too drastically. The
first was the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990. This came at the height
of the happiness at the end of the Cold War and the new era of peace that was
expected to follow. By January 1991 it was apparent that attempts to persuade
Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to withdraw through a combination of military
threats, economic pressure, and diplomatic inducements had failed. American,
British, and French forces found themselves using military equipment and
concepts designed to deal with the Warsaw Pact in central Europe to defeat a
moderate- sized Third World country. This brought home the lesson that in a
world in which total war had become too horrific to contemplate even a limited
war was no small matter and would demand considerable commitment.
Even so, the Gulf War was a relatively straightforward confrontation. It
was against a known enemy over a clear-cut matter of principle and fought by
means that played to the West' s comparative advantages, for example in air
power. To defense planners, this was much to be preferred to the considerably
more complicated types of conflict where opponents merged easily into their
surroundings, and adopted guerrilla warfare rather than open battle.
Prudent defense planners never want to get involved in messy civil wars,
while the military dislikes having to get between warring groups. It is usually
easier to get in than out of these conflicts. Yet even as troops were returning
from the Gulfin the summer of 1991, Yugoslavia was starting to fall apart. By
1992, British and French forces were being deployed in Bosnia, along with
contingents from other countries, to try to deliver humanitarian aid and soften
the blows of a bitter ethnic conflict. Eventually, in 1995, now joined by the
Americans, they began to take a much tougher line and this created the
conditions for a political settlement, although not an early withdrawal of
outside forces. They were still needed to keep the peace. The
experience of these conflicts illustrates some of the difficulties now faced by
defense planners. They must prepare for a wide range of operations, from
set-piece battles to vicious inter-communal skirmishes: Even though they may
hope that total wars are things of the past for the major industrialized
countries, limited wars might still require the sort of capabilities once
assumed to be relevant only to total wars. Limited wars also come in all shapes
and sizes. In 1982 the Falklands War was won through achieving naval superiority
followed by an amphibious landing, while in 1991 Kuwait was liberated through
air supremacy followed by a heavy armored advance. The first stage of the Gulf
crisis involved a naval blockade -- the last stage involved light forces
protecting Kurds. Bosnia involved a hybrid force of infantry geared to a
low-intensity conflict supported by ak power conducting a high-intensity
campaign. Future conflicts might involve direct attacks on environmental targets
or attempts to exploit the West's growing dependence on information technology.
Terrorism and international criminal organizations are now often presented as
the most serious threats to Western societies.
单选题The father of English poetry, the author of Troilus and Criseyde is also the one of______.
单选题What is Edward"s idea about the size of a garden attached to a house?
单选题The smallest linguistic unit that can be used independently is______.A. morphemeB. phonemeC. minimal pairD. word
单选题Tile general tone of this passage can be described as ______.
单选题{{B}}TEXT E{{/B}} People do not analyze
every problem they meet. Sometimes they try to remember a solution from the last
time they had a similar problem. They often accept the opinions or ideas of
other people. Other times they begin to act without thinking; they try to find a
solution by trial and error. However, when all these methods fall, the person
with a problem has to start analyzing. There are six stages in analyzing a
problem. First the person must recognize that there is a
problem. For example, Sam's bicycle is broken, and he cannot read it to class as
he usually does. Sam must see that there is a problem with his
bicycle. Next the thinker must define the problem. Before Sam
can repair his bicycle, he must find the reason why it does not work. For
instance, he must determine if the problem is with the gears, the brakes, or the
frame. He must make his problem more specific. Now the person
.must look for information that will make the problem clearer and lead to
possible solutions. For instance, suppose Sam decided that his bike does not
work because there is something wrong with the gear wheels. At this time. he can
look in his bicycle repair book and read about gears. He can talk to his friends
at the bike shop. He can look at his gears carefully. After
studying the problem, the person should have several suggestions for a possible
solution. Take Sam as an illustration. His suggestions might be: put oil on the
gear wheels; buy new gear wheels and replace the old ones; tighten or loosen the
gear wheels. Eventually one suggestion seems to be the solution
to the problem. Sometimes the final idea comes very suddenly because the thinker
suddenly sees something new or sees something in a new way. Sam, for example,
suddenly sees that there is a piece of chewing gum (口香糖) between the gear
wheels. He immediately realizes the solution to his problem: he must clean the
gear wheels. Finally the solution is tested. Sam cleans the gear
wheels and finds that afterwards his bicycle works perfectly. In short, he has
solved the problem.
单选题Feudalism in Britain began in the seventh century, developed during the ______ and ended in the Bourgeois Revolution.
单选题Son and Lovers was written by ______.
单选题The author mentions all BUT _________ of the following assumptions that people may have.
单选题Question 6 is based on the following news. At the end of the news item, you will be given 10 seconds to answer the question. Now listen to the news.
单选题______ is the second largest city of Canada. A. Comer Brook B. Toronto C. Montreal D. Vancouver
单选题
{{B}}TEXT A{{/B}} A common result of being
frustrated is an act of aggression, sometimes violent. To be alive is to have a
goal and pursue it — anything from cleaning the house, or planning a vacation,
to saving money for retirement. If somebody or something blocks the goal, we
begin to feel pent up and thwarted. Then we get mad. The blocked goal, the sense
of frustration, aggressive action —this is the normal human sequence. If we are
aware of what is going on inside us, however, we can save ourselves a good deal
of needless pain and trouble. Everyone has encountered
frustration on the highways. You are driving along a two-lane road behind a big
trailer-truck. You're in a hurry, while the truck driver seems to be enjoying
the scenery. After miles of increasing frustration you grow to hate him. Finally
you step on the gas and pass him defiantly, regardless of the chance you may be
taking. This kind of frustration must cause thousands of accidents a year. Yet,
if you realized what was going on in your nervous system, you could curb such
dangerous impulses. The aggressive act that frustration produces
may take a number of forms. It may be turned inward against oneself, with
suicide as the extreme example. It may hit back directly at the person or thing
causing the frustration. Or it may be transferred to another object — what
psychologists call displacement. Displacement can be directed against the dog,
the parlor furniture, the family or even total strangers. A man
rushed out of his front door in Brooklyn one fine spring morning and punched a
passerby on the nose. In court he testified that he had had a quarrel with his
wife. Instead of punching her he had the bad luck to punch a police
detective. Aggression is not always sudden and violent; it may
be devious and calculated. The spreading of rumors, malicious gossip, a
deliberate plot to discredit, are some of the roundabout forms. In some cases,
frustration leads to the opposite of aggression, a complete retreat from
life. The classic pattern of frustration and aggression is
nowhere better demonstrated than in military life. GIs studied by the noted
American sociologist Samuel A. Stouffer in the last war were found to be full of
frustrations due to their sudden loss of civilian liberty. They took it out
verbally on the brass, often most unjustly. But in combat, soldiers felt far
more friendly toward their officers. Why? Because they could discharge their
aggression directly against the enemy. Dr. Karl Menninger, of
the famous Menninger Foundation at Topeka, pointed out that children in all
societies are necessarily frustrated, practically from birth, as they are broken
into the customs of the tribe. A baby's first major decision is "whether to
holler or swaler" —when it discovers that the two acts cannot be done
simultaneously. Children have to be taught habits of cleanliness, toilet
behavior, regular feeding, punctuality; habits that too often are hammered
in. Grownups with low boiling points, said Dr. Menninger,
probably got that way because of excessive frustrations in childhood. We can
make growing up a less difficult period by giving children more love and
understanding. Parents in less civilized societies, Menninger observes,
often do this. He quotes a Mohave Indian, discussing his small son: "Why
should I strike him? He is small, I am big. He cannot hurt me."
When we do experience frustration, there are several things We can do to
channel off aggression. First, we can try to remove the cause which is
blocking our goal. An individual may be able to change his foreman, even
his job or his residence, if the frustration is a continuing one.
If this cannot be done, then we can seek harmless displacements. Physical
outlets are the most immediately helpful. Go out in the garden and dig like
fury. Or take a long Walk, punch a bag in the gym, make the pins fly in a
bowling alley, cut down a tree. The late Richard C. Tolman, a great physicist,
once told me that he continued tennis into his 60s because he found it so
helpful in working off aggressions. As a writer I receive pan
letters as well as fan letters, and some of them leave me baffled and furious.
(Some, I must admit, are justified. ) Instead of taking it out on the
family, I write the critic the nastiest reply I can contrive. That makes me feel
a lot better. Next morning I read it over with renewed satisfaction. Then I tear
it up and throw it in the wastebasket. Aggression gone, nobody
hurt. But perhaps the best way of all to displace aggressive
feelings is by hard, useful work. If both body and mind can be engaged, so much
the better. The world is filled today with a great surplus of
anger and conflict. We are far from knowing all about the sources of these
destructive feelings, but scientists have learned enough to clear up quite a
load of misery. Their findings can help us reduce that load and even utilize its
energy, through a better understanding of ourselves and our neighbors.
单选题The pair of words "high" and "low" are ______.A. gradable oppositesB. converse oppositesC. co-hyponymsD. synonyms
单选题The word "sloths" in the first paragraph probably means ______.
单选题I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation's stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won't cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here's the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such. See what I meant about politicians not liking it? Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They'll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn't have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They'll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that's about as close to a free lunch as you're likely to find. They'll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right. There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They're just not the subject of this column. The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that's not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we're not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn't care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards. In fact, there's a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we're both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you're a construction engineer and I'm a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn't speak English very well and doesn't have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills. But that's only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They're a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down. We should remember, though, that the average worker isn't every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers. And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better. This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we're going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult. Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world's most innovative and dynamic economy. It's never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet's most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That's how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they're 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
单选题{{I}} Questions 8 to 9 are based on the following news. At the end of the news item, you will be given 10 seconds to answer each question. Now listen to the news.{{/I}}
单选题[此试题无题干]
单选题Which of the following is a major feature of the new terrorism?
单选题Morphemes that can occur "unattached" are called______ morphemes.