问答题Directions:Writeanessayof160～200wordsbasedonthefollowingdrawing.Inyouressay,youshould:1)describethepicturesbriefly,2)explainitsintendedmeaning,andthen3)supportyourviewwithanexample/examples.YoushouldwriteneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.

问答题In the early 1800s, groups of English workers wrecked machines that they felt threatened their jobs. (46) They were called "Luddites" after one of their leaders, a term that is now used for anyone who puts up resistance to new teclmologies. (47) The odd thing about nanotechnology's Luddites is that they have started resisting before the technology has really established itself. As people start to buy products involving nanotechnology, from odour-resistant shirts to window glass that repels dirt, they will realise that many of these new things are useful and harmless. And as awareness of nanotechnology grows, they will begin to understand that it covers a range of different ways of doing things, some of which carry some risk and others do not. As a result, the technology's detractors will probably become more nuanced in their complaints. Nanotechnology has the potential to cause an industrial upheaval, just as electricity did in its time. (48) Like electricity, though, it has so many and such diverse applications that it is unlikely to arrive in one huge wave, as nanotechnology's critics fear. Instead, there will be a series of smaller waves. (49) Many of the innovations the technology may bring are a long way off, leaving plenty of time to prepare. Nanotechnology, like any new discovery, offers both risks and rewards. There will undoubtedly be some need to control its exploitation to minimize the risks, but there are also strong arguments for allowing the unfettered pursuit of knowledge: without it, innovation cannot flourish. Twenty years ago, nobody could have foreseen that the invention of a new microscope would launch a remarkable new technology, perhaps a revolution. (50) Scientists should be allowed to work with as little hindrance as possible to gain a better understanding of the object of their study--however large or small.

问答题{{B}}Directions:{{/B}}Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written neatly on ANSWER SHEET 2. {{U}}As technology continues to advance, countries must decide how they will deal with the issue of human cloning for reproduction or research.{{/U}} So far, several nations have placed strong restrictions on healing cloning; others are moving towards such restrictions, and a few have staked out positions in favor of curative cloning. After months of bitter debate, the Unite States must decide what it will do. All legislators can agree that it would be wrong now to make a walking, talking, reallife human clone. The National Academy of Sciences also supports that position. But its institute of Medicine has rightly said that its objections to the safety of reproductive cloning do not apply to research cloning. Indeed,' some scientists say that research cloning could yield stem cells that could be used to grow healing tissues for patients with diseases such as Parkinson's. (47){{U}}They also say that studying stem cells made from the cells of diseased patients could help us understand why people with the same genetic make-up get sick or stay well.{{/U}} Opponents of research cloning say there is no proof that it will yield any cures. They also say that adult stem cells are more promising and less controversial. They have gained Congressional and public support by beating into widespread fears about biotechnology, which some worry is winding quickly down a slippery slope towards the commodification of the human species. (48) {{U}}But such fears do not represent a sensible basis for a ban on research cloning, which is likely to give insights into the processes that cause a host of devastating diseases.{{/U}} The Senate is now moving towards a slowdown on the issue. Two bills have been introduced. Senator Sam Brownback introduced a bill that would ban cloning for any purpose. His rivals, led by Senator Dianne Feinstein, have introduced competing legislation that would all low scientists to close embryos for research. And senators eager to air their views on the issue for a vote on the matter in the next few weeks. (49) {{U}}Brown back is said to have nearly 50 supporters, but for technical reasons a bill is unlikely to be passed unless 60 senators support it.{{/U}} Advocates of healing cloning have outlined situations that would make the Senate more likely to pass a bill that would allow research cloning, such as amending the Brownback bill to allow research. In this way, senators could save face by simultaneously voting for Brownback and for research. However, any bill that does pass the Senate must be reconciled with the House bill in a conference, The Brownback bill is virtually identical to a House cloning ban that was passed last July. So it would speed through the conference committee. But Senate and House negotiators are unlikely to compromise if the Senate votes to allow healing cloning, (50) {{U}}So the result of this month's Senate debate is likely to be either that President Bush signs a bill that bans cloning for any purpose, or that he does not sign any cloning bill at all.{{/U}} The issue could also spill over into the appropriations process this autumn, when senators try to force rules through the Congress by attaching them to the necessary spending bills. The Congress has strongly supported the National Institute of Health in recent years because it wants the United States to be a world leader in biomedical research. The Senate should continue its strong support of biomedical science, and act in the national interest, by refusing to pass a ban on research cloning.

问答题Directions: Recently, the public health of dormitory building 8 is poor and there are full of some waste baskets in the corridor. Write a letter to the supervisor of dormitory building 8 to 1) complain about poor health 2) make two or three suggestions You should write about 100 words on the ANSWER SHEET. Do not sign your own name at the beginning of the memo. Use "Li Ming" instead.

问答题Outline:1. Money is considered by some people as the most powerful and important thing in life.2. But there are certain things that cannot be bought with money.3. Like everything else, money has two sides, positive and negative.

问答题{{B}}Directions:{{/B}}A.Studythefollowingpicturecarefullyandwriteanessayinnolessthan160--200words.B.YouressaymustbewrittenclearlyonANSWERSHEET2.C.Youressayshouldmeettherequirementsbelow:1)Interpretthesetofthefollowingpictures,giveyourcomments,and2)Pointoutitsimplicationsinourlife.

问答题Directions:Therehasbeenadiscussionrecentlyontheissueoftraditioninanewspaper.Writeanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthefollowingdrawing.Inyouressay,youshould1)describethedrawingbriefly,2)explainitsintendedmeaning,giveaspecificexample,and3)giveyoursuggestionastothebestwaytotreattradition.传统就像一座大山，站得远才可以看清全貌。

问答题Directions: Yesterday, you received a letter of invitation from Angelo, one of your American friends. You are asked to attend his birthday party. But you cannot accept his invitation. Write a letter to Angelo, telling him your refusal, stating your reason(s), and making an apology. Write your letter with no less than 100 words. Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter; use "Li Ming" instead. You do not need to write the address.

问答题{{B}}Directions:{{/B}}{{I}}Studythefollowingphotoscarefullyandwriteanessayinwhichyoushould1)describethephotosbriefly2)interpretthesocialphenomenonreflectedbythem,and3)giveyourpointofviewYoushouldwrite160-200wordsneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.(20points){{/I}}

问答题Directions:Enormouschangestookplaceinthelasttwodecadesofthe20thcentury,whichisrevealedinthechangesondinertables.Herearetwopairsofpictures.Youarerequiredto1)describethepictures,2)interpretthepictures,and3)makeacommentuponit.Youshouldwriteabout200wordsneatlyonANSWERSHEET2.

问答题{{B}}Directions:{{/B}}Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written neatly on ANSWER SHEET 2. {{U}}A new study claiming to document a connection between violence on television and violence in real life is already coming under attack from academics.{{/U}} They say that the author is demanding action on his report before producing detailed findings to substantiate it. (47) {{U}}Dr. William Belson told the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Birmingham last week that his research suggested that boys exposed to high levels of television violence were 50 percent more likely to commit acts of violence than boys who had not been exposed.{{/U}} His 110,000 pounds survey, paid for by CBS, the American television company, studied more than 15,000 London boys aged between 12 and 16. He closed his paper with a call for immediate action on his recommendations to reduce levels of TV violence and specific kinds of violence which he claimed were more damaging than others. His recommendations were enthusiastically endorsed by Mrs. Mary Whitehouse. Social scientists familiar with the field have a number of specific queries about Belson's work. (48) {{U}}They pointed out that a statistical technique invented by him and central to his research has been criticized by some academics in the past.{{/U}} Robin MrCorn, of the Mass Communication Research Centre at Leicester University, says," Self reporting—asking the subject to give his own account of the evidence is notoriously unreliable. Studies have put the possible error as high as 20 percent, and we don't know what checks there were in this work. The fact that Belson paid the boys may' have had an influence. Without the full data, it can't be checked." McCorn adds:" His questions on the programmes go back 12 years. If the boys were aged between 13 and 16 it means the oldest was only four years old when the first programmes were broadcast. How reliable is the memory of a child that young likely to be on the programmes he watched? Dr. Belson may have answers, but we just don't know." (49) {{U}}The Nelson affair highlights the difficulties faced by researchers into television violence-problems so severe that at least one British group has withdrawn from the field completely. "It's impossible to do serious scientific work in his area now," says Robin McCron.{{/U}} "It has moved out of the academic world and it has been taken over by pressure groups and politics." Indeed, experience in television research in America reveals how treacherous this field has become. (50) {{U}}Results of nervous projects there have been found, at worst, contradictory, at best, inconclusive.{{/U}}

问答题Directions: Yesterday you learnt in a newspaper advertisement that there is a job vacancy in a foreign owned company. What is being recruited is a secretary for the manager. Write a letter to its personnel department, 1) showing your intention for the position, 2) displaying your qualifications, 3) and expressing your inquiry about an job interview. Write your letter in no less than 100 words. Write it neatly on ANSWER SHEET 2. Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter, use "Li Ming" instead. Do not write the address.

问答题Directions:Writeanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthefollowingdrawing.Inyouressay,youshould1)describethedrawingbriefly,2)explainitsintendedmeaning,and3)giveyourcomments.YoushouldwriteneatlyontheANSWERSHEET.

问答题Directions:Thechartbelowshowsthechangesofconsumerindexinacertaincountryfrom1930to1980.Studythechartcarefullyandwriteanessayto1)describethetrendofconsumptionasrevealedinthechart,2)explainthepossiblereasonunderliningthistrend,and3)giveyourcomment.Youshouldwrite160-200wordsonAnswerSheetⅡ.

问答题A new study claiming to document a connection between violence on television and violence in real life is already coming under attack from academics. They say that the author is demanding action on his report before producing detailed findings to substantiate it. (47) Dr. William Belson told the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Birmingham last week that his research suggested that boys exposed to high levels of television violence were 50 percent more likely to commit acts of violence than boys who had not been exposed. His 110,000 pounds survey, paid for by CBS, the American television company, studied more than 15,000 London boys aged between 12 and 16. He closed his paper with a call for immediate action on his recommendations to reduce levels of TV violence and specific kinds of violence which he claimed were more damaging than others. His recommendations were enthusiastically endorsed by Mrs. Mary Whitehouse. Social scientists familiar with the field have a number of specific queries about Belson's work. (48) They pointed out that a statistical technique invented by him and central to his research has been criticized by some academics in the past. Robin MrCorn, of the Mass Communication Research Centre at Leicester University, says," Self reporting—asking the subject to give his own account of the evidence is notoriously unreliable. Studies have put the possible error as high as 20 percent, and we don't know what checks there were in this work. The fact that Belson paid the boys may' have had an influence. Without the full data, it can't be checked." McCorn adds:" His questions on the programmes go back 12 years. If the boys were aged between 13 and 16 it means the oldest was only four years old when the first programmes were broadcast. How reliable is the memory of a child that young likely to be on the programmes he watched? Dr. Belson may have answers, but we just don't know." (49) The Nelson affair highlights the difficulties faced by researchers into television violence-problems so severe that at least one British group has withdrawn from the field completely. "It's impossible to do serious scientific work in his area now," says Robin McCron. "It has moved out of the academic world and it has been taken over by pressure groups and politics." Indeed, experience in television research in America reveals how treacherous this field has become. (50) Results of nervous projects there have been found, at worst, contradictory, at best, inconclusive.