问答题耕地流失

问答题League of Arab states

问答题aircraft carrier

问答题黑帮

问答题Source Text 3: 新疆维吾尔自治区地处中国西北边陲，亚欧大陆腹地，面积166.49万平方公里，占中国国土面积六分之一，陆地边境线5600公里，周边与8个国家接壤，是古丝绸之路的重要通道。据2000年统计，新疆人口为1925万人，其中汉族以外的其他民族为1096.96万人。新疆自古以来就是一个多民族聚居和多种宗教并存的地区，从西汉（公元前206年—公元24年）起成为中国统一的多民族国家不可分割的组成部分。

问答题自助游

问答题The vendor shall deliver the goods to the vendee by June 15.

问答题贫富不均

问答题genome

问答题拆迁费

问答题团购

问答题Most-favored-nation Treatment

问答题In case of discrepancy, claim should be filed by the Buyer within 30 days after the arrival of the goods at the port of destination.

问答题With globalization in the modern world, people have different opinions as to whether there should be a universal language. Do you think it necessary to have a worldwide standard language, say King"s English?

问答题Advertisements are getting their way into people's lives. Some people hold that advertisements should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree? Write about 400 words on the following topic: Should advertisements be restricted? In the first part of your essay you should state clearly your main argument, and in the second part you should support your argument with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or make a summary. Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. Write your essay on the ANSWER SHEET.

问答题Pygmalion

问答题The Fine Art of Marital Fighting In the morning his secretary quits, in the afternoon, his rival at the office gets a promotion; when he gets home that evening he finds out his wife has put a dent in the new car. He drinks four martinis before dinner, and blames his wife a lousy cook. She says how can he tell with all that gin in him, and he says she is getting as mean tempered as her stupid mother, and she says at least her mother wasn"t stupid enough to marry a phony slob, by which time he is bellowing like an enraged moose, she is shrieking and hurling dishes, the baby is screaming, the dogs are yapping, the neighbors are pounding on the walls, and the cops are on their way. Suddenly a car screeches to the curb and a litter man with a tape recorder under his arm hops out and dashed inside. This scene is recurrent dream of George R. Bach, Ph. D. , a Los Angeles clinical psychologist and West Coast channel of the American Academy of Psychotherapy. For him, it is not a nightmare but a rosy fantasy of things to come. His great ambition is to set up a Los Angeles Clinical Night Center which any embattled husband or wife, regardless of race, creed, of hour of the night, could telephone and get a fair heating. Trained marriage counselors would manage the switchboards, referee the disputes, tape-record the hubub for analysis at dawn"s early light, and if necessary, dispatch a mobile referee on a house call. He always has dreamed to become that referee. He studies human aggression, and he loves his work over the last twenty-five years, he has professionally analyzed 23,000 marital rights, including, he figures, at least 2500 of his own. Gifted marital gladiators in action thrill him as the sunset does the poet. Unfortunately, his clinical practice yields so few sunsets that Bach feels the future of American family life is gravely threatened. He recently told a startled audience of newsmen and psychiatrists at the annual meeting of the Ortho-Psychiatric Association that a primary aim of psychotherapy and marriage counseling should be "to teach couples to have more, shorter more constructive fights." Along with a growing number of his colleagues, he says, he has come to believe that proper training in "the fine art of marital fighting" would not only improve domestic tranquility, it could reduce divorces by up to 90 percent. What dismays the doctor is not bloodshed per se; it is the native cowardice and abysmal crudity of American domestic fighting style. Most husbands and wives, he has found, will avail themselves of any sneaky excuse to avoid a fight in the first place. But if cornered, they begin clobbering away at one another like dull-witted Neanderthals. "They are clumsy, weak-kneed, afflicted with poor aim, rotten timing, and no notion of counterpunching. What"s more, they fight dirty. Their favorite weapons are the low blow and the rock-filled glove. The cause of the shoddy, low estate of the marital fight game is a misunderstanding of aggression itself, says the fight doctor. "Research has established that people always dream, and my research has established that people are always to some degree angry. But today they are ashamed of this anger. To express hostile feelings toward a loved one is considered impolite, just as the expression of sexual feelings was considered impolite before Freud." What Freud did for sex, Bach, in his own modest way, would like to do for anger, which is almost as basic a human impulse, "We must remove the shame from aggression," he exhorts in a soft, singsong German accent much like Peter Lorre"s. "Don"t repress your aggressions—program them!" When primitive man lived in the jungle, surrounded by real, lethal enemies, the aggressive impulse is what kept him alive. For modern man, the problem gets complicated because he usually encounters only what the psychologist cells "intimate enemies"—wives, husbands, sweethearts, children, parents, friends, and others whom he sometimes would like to kill, but toward whom he nonetheless feels basic, underlying goodwill. When he gets mad at one of these people, modern man tends to go to pieces. His jungle rage embarrasses, betrays, even terrifies him. "He forgets that real intimacy demands that there be fighting," Bach says. He failed to realize that "nonfighting is only appropriate between strangers—people who have nothing worth fighting about. When two people begin to really care about each other, they become emotionally vulnerable—and the battles start." Listening to Bach enumerate the many destructive, "bad" fight styles is rather like strolling through a vast Stillman"s gym of domestic discord. Over there, lolling about on the canvas, watching TV, walking out, sitting in a trancelike state, drinking beer, doing their nails, even falling asleep, are the "Withdrawal-Evaders," people who will not fight. These people, Bach says, are very sick. After counseling thousands of them, he is convinced that "falling asleep causes more divorces than any other single act." And over there, viciously flailing, kicking and throwing knives at one another, shouting obnoxious abuse, hitting below the belt, deliberately provoking anger, exchanging meaningless insults (You stink! You doublestink!)—simply needling or battering one another for the hell of it—are people indulging in "open noxious attack." They are the "Professional Ego-Smashers," and they are almost as sick—but not quite—as the first bunch. An interesting subgroup here are the "Chain-Reactors," specialists in what Bach has characterized as "throwing in the kitchen sink from left field." A chain-reaching husband opens up by remarking, "Well, I see you burned the toast again this morning." When his wife begins to make new toast, he continues, "And another thing...that no-good brother of yours hasn"t had a job for two years." This sort of fight, says Bach. "usually pyramids to a Valhalla-type of total attack." The third group of people are all smiling blandly and saying. "Yes, dear." But each one drags after him a huge gunnysack. These people are the "Pseudo Accommodators," the ones who pretend to go along with the partner"s point of view for the sake of momentary peace, but who never really mean it. The gunnysacks are full of grievance, reservations, doubts, secret contempt. Eventually the overloaded sacks burst open, making an awful mess. The fourth group are "Carom Fighters". They use noxious attack not directly against the partner but against some person, idea, activity, value, or object which the partner lovers or stands for. They are a whiz at spoiling a good mood or wrecking a party, and when they really get mad, they can be extremely dangerous. Bach once made a study of one hundred intimate murders and discovered that two-thirds of the killers did not kill their partner, but instead destroyed someone whom the partner loved. Even more destructive are the "Double Binders." People who set up warm expectations but make no attempt to fulfill them, or, worse, deliver a rebuke instead of the promised reward. This nasty technique is known to some psychologists as the "mew phenomenon": "Kitty mews for mill. The mother cat mews hack warmly to intimate that kitty should come and get it. But when the kitten nuzzles up for a drink, he gets slashed in the face with a sharp claw instead." In human terms a wife says, for example, "I have nothing to wear." Her husband says, "Buy yourself a new dress—you deserve it." But when she comes home wearing beautifully, he says, "What"s that thing supposed to be, a paper bag with sleeves?"—asking, "Boy, do you look fat!" The most irritating bad fighters, according to Bach, are the "Character Analysts," a pompous lot of stuffed shirts who love to explain to the mate what his or her real subconscious or hidden feelings are. This accomplished nothing except to infuriate the mate by putting him on the defensive for being himself. This style of fighting is common among lawyers, members of the professional classes, and especially, psychotherapists, It is presumptuous, highly alienating, and never in the least useful except in those rare partnerships in which husband and wife are equally addicted to a sick, sick game which Bach calls "Psychoanalytic Archaeology—the earlier, the farther hack, the deeper, the better". In a far corner of Bach"s marital gym are the "Gimmes," overdemanding fighters who specialize in "overloading the system." They always want more; nothing is ever enough. New car, new house, more money, more love, more understanding—no matter what the specific demand, the partner never can satisfy it. It is a bottomless well. Across from them are found the "Withholders," stingily restraining affection, approval, recognition, material things, privileges—anything which could he provided with reasonable effort or concern and which would give pleasure or make life easier for the partner. In a dark, scary back corner are the "underminers," who deliberately arouse or intensify emotional insecurities, reinforce moods of anxiety or depression, try to keep the partner on edge, threaten disaster, or continually harp on something the partner dreads. They may even wish it to happen. The last group are the "Benedict Arnolds," who not only fail to defend their partners against destructive, dangerous, and unfair situations, forces, people, and attacks but actually encourage such assaults from outsiders. Husbands and wives who come to Psychologist Bach for help invariably can identify themselves from the categories he lists. If they do not recognize themselves, at least they recognize their mate. Either way, most are desperate to know what can be done. Somewhere, they feel, there must be another, sunnier, marital gym, a vast Olympic Games perhaps, populated with nothing but agile, happy, bobbing, weaving, superbly muscles, and incredibly sportsmanlike gladiators.

问答题Rights of the Copyright Owner 1. Rights of reproduction, distribution, and display. The author of a work possesses, at the beginning, a bundle of rights that collectively make up copyright. They belong originally to the author, who can sell, rent, give away, will, or transfer them in some other way, individually or as a package, to whomever the author wishes. When a work is to be published, the author normally transfers some or all of these rights to the publisher, by formal agreement. Two of these rights are basic from the publisher"s point of view: the right to make copies of the work (traditionally by printing and now often by digital reproduction) and the right to distribute such copies to the public—in sum, to publish the work. In the case of online publishing, reproduction and distribution blend into the act of transmitting the work on demand to the reader"s computer. A third right—the right of public display—applies to online exploitation of works. A work is publicly displayed when made viewable online; if the user downloads or prints out the material concerned, a distribution of a copy also occurs. 2. Derivative work and performance rights. A fourth and very important right is the right to make what the law terms derivative works—that is, works based on or derived from the original work, such as translations, abridgments, dramatizations, or other adaptations. A revised edition of a published work is generally noticeably different enough from the prior edition to qualify as a derivative work with a separate copyright. The fifth basic copyright right, the right of public performance, has only limited relevance for literary works as such; it applies, for example, when a poet gives a public reading of a poem. However, it has great significance for other works, such as motion pictures, that may spring from literary works.

问答题Shanghai World Expo

问答题我用眼泪和叹息埋葬了我的一些家人，他们是被旧礼教杀了的。