问答题In relation to company law, discuss whether a company is allowed to issue shares at a discount. (10 marks)

问答题(b) the remedies available for unfair dismissal. (4 marks)

问答题In relation to the law of contract, explain the rules relating to the award of damages for breach of contract. (10 marks)

问答题(b) the articles of association, paying particular regard to how these can be altered. (6 marks)

问答题(b) Chip, for not selling the pottery to him.

问答题(b) describe the composition of the National Assembly of Pakistan. (7 marks)

问答题In relation to company law, discuss the concept and effect of the doctrine of ‘limited liability’. (10 marks)

问答题In relation to employment law, explain the difference between a contract of service and a contract for services, and why this distinction is important. (10 marks)

问答题In terms of the Companies Act, 1995, explain and distinguish between ordinary resolutions and extra-ordinary resolutions, which may be taken by the shareholders of a limited liability company. (10 marks)

问答题(b) Explain how the laws relating to companies protect shareholders and promote good corporate governance. (6 marks)

问答题Under the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, explain the process of legislation through Ordinances. (10 marks)

问答题(b) employees. (4 marks)

问答题In relation to the Vietnamese legal system, explain how the courts and other bodies deal with a situation in which there is an absence of a written law to resolve a case. (10 marks)

问答题(c) state the particular transaction of Hongyan Co that could be revoked by the bankruptcy administrator in the process of liquidation; and (3 marks)

问答题Ali is an antique dealer and one Saturday in November 2007 he put a vase in the window of his shop with a sign which stated ‘exceptional piece of 19th century pottery – on offer for ￡500’. Ben happened to notice the vase as he walked past the shop and thought he would like to have it. Unfortunately, as he was late for an important meeting, he could not go into the shop to buy it, but as soon as his meeting was finished he wrote to Ali agreeing to buy the vase for the stated price of ￡500. The letter was posted at 11:30 am. Later on the same day, Chet visited Ali’s shop and said he would like the vase but was only willing to pay ￡400 for it. Ali replied that he would accept ￡450 for the vase, but Chet insisted that he was only willing to pay ￡400 and left the shop. However, on his journey home Chet realised that ￡450 was actually a very good price for the vase and he immediately wrote to Ali agreeing to buy it for that price. His letter was posted at 12:30 pm. Just before closing time at 5 pm. Di came into Ali’s shop and she also offered ￡400 for the vase. This time Ali agreed to sell the vase at that price and Di promised to return the following Monday with the money. On the Monday morning Ali received both of the letters from Ben and Chet before Di could arrive to pay and collect the vase. Required: From the point of view of the law of contract advise Ali as to his legal relations with Ben, Chet and Di. (10 marks)

问答题In the context of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, explain the meaning, and effect, of the concept of ‘anticipatory breach’. (10 marks)

问答题(b) State whether your answer would be different: (i) if Mowana Ltd had posted their letter to Luzibo at 8.00 am on 6 June; and (3 marks) (ii) if Luzibo had requested the company to enter her name in the register and sign it on her behalf. (2 marks)

问答题(c) the defence of adequate procedures. (2 marks)

问答题(c) the role of the company names adjudicators under the Companies Act 2006. (2 marks)

问答题Daniel had been the owner of a restaurant, which is named Daniel Restaurant, before he sold the restaurant to Eddy two years ago (‘the sale’). Ever since the restaurant started business, all the food of the restaurant has been supplied by Mary. Mary has only dealt with Daniel regarding the sale and the settlement of the price relating to the food supplied to the restaurant. After the sale, Daniel continued to work in the restaurant in the same way as he used to do. The name of the restaurant remained the same as before and Daniel was still the holder of the business certificate and the licence of the restaurant. Last week, the restaurant failed to settle the price for some of the food. Mary had no knowledge that the business of the restaurant had changed hands and that Eddy was the true owner of the restaurant (‘the facts’) until Daniel told her the facts this morning for the first time. Required: In relation to agency law, advise Mary as to the proper persons against whom legal action may be commenced for the recovery of the price. (10 marks)