期刊文献+

再论强制阐释 被引量:84

A Re-Discussion of Imposed Interpretation
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国阐释学的建构,首先必须在解决诸多具有基础性意义的元问题上有新的见解和进步。强制阐释作为一种阐释方式,在各学科文本研究与理论建构上,已有极为普遍的表现。偷换对象,变幻话语,借文本之名,阐本己之意,且将此意强加于文本,宣称文本即为此意。如此阐释方式,违反阐释逻辑规则和阐释伦理,其合法性当受质疑。阐释是有对象的。对象是确定的。背离确定对象,阐释的合法性即被消解。在心理学意义上,强制阐释有其当然发生的理由,但绝非意味着强制阐释就是合理且不可克服的。就像谬误难以避免,但并不意味着它就是合理且不可克服的一样,更不意味着它就是真理。具有强大理论与逻辑力量的阐释无须强制。阐释是动机阐释。坚持阐释对象的确定性,坚持阐释学意义上的整体性追求,对阐释动机的盲目展开以有效的理性约束,是实现正当及合理阐释的根本之道。在文学领域以外,对由主观动机发起的强制阐释尤当保持警惕。坚持从现象本身出发,坚持阐释的整体性观点,坚持阐释的多重多向循环,是合理规范阐释强制性的有效方式。 The construction of the Chinese hermeneutics must,first of all,have new insights and progress in solving many fundamental meta-problems.Imposed interpretation,as a kind of interpretation,has been very common in the study and theoretical construction of texts in various disciplines.By adopting the method of imposed interpretation,one steals objects and employs disguised discourse;using the name of the text,one elucidates one’s own ideas,imposing these ideas on the text,and claiming that that is what the text means.Such a means of interpretation violates the rules of logic and ethics of hermeneutics,so its legitimacy should be questioned.Any interpretation has an object.The object is determined.The legitimacy of interpretation dissolves when it deviates from the determined object.In the psychological sense,there is a reason for imposed interpretation,but this does not mean that it is justifiable or insurmountable.This is just like the fact that a fallacy is unavoidable does not mean that it is justifiable or insurmountable,or that it is the truth.Interpretations with strong theoretical and logical force do not need to be imposed.Interpretation is of motivation-driven nature.The fundamental way to achieve proper and reasonable interpretation is to insist on the certainty of the object of interpretation and on the pursuit of hermeneutical wholeness,and to use rationality to effectively restrain the arbitrary outstretch of the motive of interpretation.Outside the field of literature,it is particularly important to be vigilant against imposed interpretations initiated by subjective motives.The effective way of limiting imposed interpretation is to insist on starting from the phenomenon itself,with a holistic view of and the multiple and multi-directional cycles of interpretation.
作者 张江 Zhang Jiang
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期4-23,204,共21页 Social Sciences in China
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代中国特色文艺理论基本问题研究”(18VXK007)阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1朱立元主编.《当代西方文艺理论》,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007年,第341页.
  • 2汤因比.《历史研究》,上海人民出版社2005年版,第19页.
  • 3《马克思恩格斯文集》第1卷,人民出版社2009年版第52页.
  • 4理查德·罗蒂.《后哲学文化》[M].上海译文出版社,1992年..
  • 5.《马克思恩格斯选集》第4卷[M].人民出版社,1995年版..
  • 6杰姆逊.《后现代主义与文化理论》[M].北京大学出版社,1997年.第118、119页.
  • 7J希利斯·米勒 郭英剑等译.《重申解构主义》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1998年.第178、203、275页.
  • 8弗洛伊德:《释梦》,商务印书馆.1996年版。
  • 9伽达默尔.《真理与方法》.洪汉鼎译,商务印书馆2010年版,第427页.
  • 10Frye, Northrop, Anatomy of Criticism: four essays. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1957, p. 6.

共引文献542

同被引文献632

引证文献84

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部