摘要
《钟山》敏锐地捕捉到“新写实小说”萌芽的讯号,以推出《新写实小说大联展》栏目的形式获得命名权,并通过理论倡导集结了大批作家,推出三十余部“新写实小说”。但实际上《钟山》的理论倡导与作品推介之间存在贴合和错位共生的现象,有些作品并不完全符合《钟山》对“新写实小说”的理论界定。这是由《钟山》自身的发展策略决定的,为的是满足团结和凝聚更多作家尤其是知名作家,获得源源不断的优质稿件的发展需要。面对这个尴尬的局面,《钟山》则积极组织理论评述为自己辩护。
Zhongshankeenly captured the signal of the sprouting of“new realistic novels”,obtained the naming right in the form of launching the column of“new realistic novels joint exhibition”,and gathered a large number of writers through theoretical advocacy to launch more than 30“new realistic novels”.However,in fact,there is a phenomenon of fit and dislocation symbiosis between the theoretical advocacy and work promotion of Zhongshan,and some works do not completely conform to the theoretical definition of“new realistic novel”in Zhongshan.This is determined by Zhongshan’s own development strategy which is to unit and gather more writers,especially well-known writers to obtain continuous high-quality manuscripts.In the face of this embarrassing situation,Zhongshan actively defend itself by organizing theoretical reviews.
作者
宋敏
SONG Min(College of Literal Arts,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)
出处
《郑州师范教育》
2022年第3期82-87,共6页
Journal of Zhengzhou Normal Education
基金
湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会基金项目“中国现代文学观念与社会思潮的互动机制研究”(XSP22YBC152)
关键词
《钟山》
新写实小说大联展
理论倡导
作品推介
Zhongshan
new realistic novels joint exhibition
theoretical advocacy
work promotion
