摘要
云南大理征收口罩案件,反映了我国应急财产保障法律制度供给的不足和实践运行的不规范。《中华人民共和国突发事件应对法》和现行突发事件应对法律法规并未规定紧急征收、紧急征购制度,有关紧急征用的制度设计存在概念使用混乱,征用主体不统一、征用范围不合理不明确,征用程序和征用补偿欠缺等突出问题。一些地方政府的应急征用规章规范性文件在填补征用程序和征用补偿制度漏洞方面进行了有益探索,但混淆了征收和征用的界限。在《中华人民共和国突发事件应对法》《中华人民共和国传染病防治法》等诸多突发事件应对法律法规启动修改,新颁布《中华人民共和国民法典》规定突发事件应对强制缔约制度的背景下,应进一步完善我国突发事件应急物资保障制度和明确相关法律规定,建立健全边界清晰、规范明确、协调统一的紧急征收、征用、征购及调用制度。
The Dali’s requisition of masks case highlights the insufficiency of China’s emergency property security legal system supply and irregular practice.The Emergency Response Law and other current emergency response laws and regulations do not stipulate the system of emergency collection and emergency collection.System design related to emergency expropriation has confusion in concept usage,inconsistency of subject of expropriation,unreasonable and unclear scope of expropriation,lack of requisition procedures and compensation.Some local governments’emergency requisition regulations and normative documents have made active explorations in filling the loopholes in the requisition procedure and the requisition compensation system,but they have confused the boundaries of requisition and taking over for use.In the context of the Emergency Response Law,the Infectious Disease Prevention Law,and many other emergency response laws and regulations,preparations for revision have been made,and the newly promulgated"Civil Code"stipulates that emergency response should be mandatory contracting,we should restructure our country’s emergency response property security system,and establish a sound emergency collection,expropriation,taking over for use,and transfer system with clear boundaries,clear specifications,and uniform coordination.
出处
《中国应急管理科学》
2020年第6期61-73,共13页
Journal of China Emergency Management Science
关键词
突发事件
紧急征收
紧急征用
紧急征购
紧急调用
emergencies
emergency collection
emergency taking for use
emergency purchase
emergency call
