摘要
《塔林手册2.0版》将作为网络空间国际法发展出发点和落脚点的网络空间国际争端解决贯穿于全部条文始末,并与审慎原则深度融合,是网络空间颇具代表性的国际软法。然而,《塔林手册2.0版》并非无懈可击。按网络空间国际争端从产生到发展的流程分析,在审慎义务视角下目标国的反应关系到争端本体是否启动;在争端启动后的解决方式上也因实践中存在的归因难题、规则本身的抽象性以及对争端主体类型的限制等时常陷入选择困境;回归条款本身,争端解决的总进程更是受规定模糊性和条款间意思冲突的影响。因此,客观分析审慎义务中的争端解决问题,以点带面辩证看待《塔林手册2.0版》,有利于理解和改善网络空间国际争端解决现状,促进网络空间国际立法进程。
The Tallinn Handbook version 2.0,as the starting point and foothold of the development of international law in cyberspace,runs through all the articles and is deeply integrated with the principle of prudence.It is a representative international soft law in cyberspace.However,Tallinn manual version 2.0 is not impeccable.According to the analysis of the process from the emergence to the development of international disputes in cyberspace,from the perspective of Prudential obligation,the response of the target country is related to whether the dispute itself is started or not;In the way of settlement after the start of disputes,it is often in a dilemma of choice because of the problems of attribution in practice,the abstraction of the rules themselves and the restrictions on the types of dispute subjects;Return to the clause itself,the general process of dispute settlement is affected by the ambiguity of the provisions and the conflict of meaning between the clauses.This paper holds that an objective analysis of the dispute settlement in the duty of prudence and a dialectical view of Tallinn manual version 2.0 from point to area are conducive to understanding and improving the current situation of international dispute settlement in cyberspace and promoting the process of international legislation in cyberspace.
出处
《行政与法》
2021年第9期85-95,共11页
Administration and Law
