摘要
我国行政协议由单方行政行为的概念出发,经诉讼法突围,最终进入司法实务进而凝结成一般规范。这种历史惯性使得行政协议诉讼规则大规模地承袭单方行政行为的诉讼规则,而我国行政机关无法提起诉讼的传统,则进一步强化了这一套诉讼规则,使得单纯合约性争议的当事人主义诉讼被忽视,造成诉、审、判之间杂糅与错位等诸多问题。要解决这些问题,必须在实体上厘清行政协议与行政行为这两个法律用语的关系,进而按诉讼类型区分、融合及转换适用不同的诉讼规则。
China administrative agreement starts from the concept of unilateral administrative action,after breaking through the procedural law,it eventually enters judicial practice and condenses into general norms.This historical inertia makes the administrative agreement litigation rules inherit the litigation rules of unilateral administrative actions on a large scale,and the tradition of my country’s administrative agencies unable to initiate litigation further strengthens this set of litigation rules,making the party-based litigation of purely contractual disputes Ignorance has caused many problems such as confusion and dislocation among litigation,trial and judgment.To solve these problems,it is necessary to clarify the relationship between the two legal terms,the administrative agreement and the administrative act,on the entity,and then to distinguish,integrate and transform different litigation rules according to the type of litigation.
作者
章程
ZHANG Cheng(Guanghua Law School,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310008)
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第3期103-113,共11页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
行为之诉
当事人主义诉讼
行政协议
行政行为
Action Suit
Party-Oriented Litigation
Administrative Agreement
Administrative Act
