摘要
集体土地征收补偿协议无效案件群体性明显,上诉和申请再审率较高,判决考量因素多。法律适用上有行政法律规范、民法以及民行法律规范双重审查三种模式。协议无效审查在民事、行政法律规范的选择适用路径不同,行政行为无效与民事无效审查适用的“法律依据”不同,审查中“公”的合法性与“私”的安定性存在矛盾。无效审查应审查行政行为合法性与双方协议效力性,主体上应具有行政主体资格、具有法定行政职权,程序上严重违反法定程序的视为无效,轻微程序违法等能够治愈的不否定其效力。法律适用上应优先评判行政行为的合法性,再通过价值判断审查其效力性。
The invalid cases of collective land expropriation compensation agreement are obvious in groups.The rate of appeal and application for retrial is high,and there are many factors to consider in the judgment.There are three modes in the application of law:administrative law,civil law and civil-administative law.The review of invalid agreement has different application paths in the choice of civil and administrative legal norms,the impact of the legitimacy of administrative act on the effectiveness of the agreement is discordant,the“legal basis”for the application of invalid administrative act and civil invalid review is different,and there is a contradiction between the legitimacy of“public”and the stability of“private”in the review.The review of invalidity should examine the legitimacy of administrative acts and the effectiveness of the agreement between the two parties.The subject should have the qualification of administrative subject and legal administrative functions and powers.If there is a serious violation of legal procedures in the procedure,it will be deemed invalid.If there is a slight procedural violation that can be cured,its effectiveness will not be denied.In the application of law,we should give priority to judging the legitimacy of administrative acts,and then examine their effectiveness through value judgment.
作者
刘华飞
马晋
Liu Huafei;Ma Jin(Tianjin Hexi District People’s court,Tianjin 300204,China)
出处
《天津法学》
2022年第1期34-43,共10页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
集体土地征收
行政协议
协议无效
collective land expropriation
administrative agreement
invalidity of agreement
