摘要
文章从我国法律制度出发,对现行法律规范中“证据确实充分”这一传统规定的含义进行了剖析,说明了仅使用“证据确实充分”的表述不足以明确案件的证明标准。欲使证明标准的表述不致发生混淆,通过对治安管理处罚证明标准与行政诉讼证明标准的关系进行分析,阐明了治安管理处罚证明标准的独立价值,并参考了三大诉讼法的相关规定和标准的异同之处,作为确定治安管理处罚案件的参考,对我国治安管理处罚案件的各种情形进行分析,对不同情形所使用的证明标准的方案提出建议。
Starting from China’s legal system,the authors analyze the meaning of the traditional provision of“indeed sufficient evidence”in the current legal norms,and explain that the expression of“indeed sufficient evidence”is not enough to clarify the standard of proof of the case.In order to avoid confusion in the expression of the standard of proof,the authors analyze the relationship between the standard of proof of public security management punishment and the standard of proof of administrative litigation,and expound the independent value of the standard of proof of public security management punishment;It also refers to the similarities and differences of the relevant provisions and standards of the three procedural laws as a reference for determining public security management punishment cases;Finally,they analyze various situations of public security management punishment cases in China,and put forward suggestions on the scheme of proof standard used in different situations,hoping to establish an independent and diversified proof standard that is not dependent on litigation,in order to be beneficial to relevant research and legislation.
作者
赵毅
王丽丽
Zhao Yi;Wang Lili(Tianjin Public Security Profession College,Tianjin 300382,China)
出处
《天津法学》
2021年第4期29-36,共8页
Tianjin Legal Science
基金
公安部2018年理论及软科学研究计划项目课题“公安证据法学视域下的执法规范化考察——依法治国视角下的派出所行为研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:2018LLYJTJSJ051
关键词
治安管理处罚
证明标准
多元化
public security management punishment
standard of proof
diversification
