摘要
在康德与孔子的哲学互镜中,不难发现二者均深具“道义”色彩:与重视“自由”是“责任”的前提条件相比,更强调“责任”是“自由”的生成根据——唯有担当责任,方可配享自由。然而,在对责任的具体理解上,孔子并未囿于主体一维,而是更多地致力于自我与他者的融合:一方面,寓德行于群体之间,彰显出责任的“毋我”特质;另一方面,在明察伦常中培养能力、提升境界,涵养了责任的“为己”品格。而毋我与为己的回环互动、交修并进,既是增强责任意识的工夫所在,又是防止自由异化的重要屏障。
Contrast with Kant and Confucius'philosophy,we can see that they not only pay attention to“freedom”is the precondition of“responsibility”,also stressed that“responsibility”is according to“freedom”.But people could enjoy freedom only when they undertake responsibility.In understanding of responsibility,Confucius did not limit himself to the dimension of subject,but committed more to the fusion of“Non-selfish”and“Self-improvement”.The interaction of“non-selfish”and“self-improvement”constitute the primitive power and intrinsic character of responsibility.As far as the former is concerned,responsibility is manifested in the coherence of group and morality;in the latter case,responsibility also means the cultivation of“ability”and the promotion of“realm”.It is not only the work of strengthening the sense of responsibility,but also the important barrier to prevent free alienation.
出处
《思想与文化》
2021年第2期295-308,共14页
Thought & Culture
基金
国家社科基金青年项目“先秦儒家‘成人’思想的形上意蕴研究”(18CZX040)
关键词
自由
责任
道义论
毋我
为己
freedom
responsibility
deontology
Non-selfish
Self-improvement
