摘要
科学咨询程序是提高风险规制科学理性、促成风险规制决策合法性的一项重要程序建制。从应然定位上,在风险规制决策中,科学专家在科学咨询中应当恪守"诚实代理人"的制度角色。当前我国食品和环境等风险规制领域中科学咨询实践的功能异化问题较为突出,暴露出我国风险规制科学咨询制度设计的内在缺陷。美国食品和环境风险规制科学咨询程序制度设计上提供了可资借鉴的经验。我国应从制度设计上加以完善,以确保风险规制科学咨询的卓越性、独立性和透明性。
Scientific advisory procedure is an important procedure mechanism to improve the scientific rationality of risk regulation and promote the legitimacy of risk regulation decision-making. The scientific experts should adhere to the role of "the honest broker" in scientific advisory procedure. At present,there exists a problem of functional alienation in the scientific advisory practice in the field of food and environment risk regulation,which exposes the inherent flaws in the design of the scientific advisory procedure of risk regulation in china. The design of the scientific advisory procedure system of food and environmental risks in America provides us with some experience to be used for reference. We should improve the system design to ensure the excellence,independence and transparency of the scientific advisory procedure of risk regulation.
出处
《私法》
2019年第2期98-138,共41页
Private Law Review
基金
2018年江西省人文社会科学研究青年项目“大数据挖掘风险的法律规制研究”(FX18203)
国家社科基金青年项目“行政法视野下食品安全风险交流制度研究”(18CFX061).
关键词
风险规制
科学咨询
规制科学
合法性
利益声明制度
Risk Regulation
Scientific Advice
Regulatory Science
Legitimacy
Declaration of Interest System
