期刊文献+

重访家庭革命:流通中的虚构与破坏中的建设 被引量:6

Fiction in Circulation and Construction in Destruction:Reviewing Family Revolution
原文传递
导出
摘要 近代中国的家庭革命是个仿佛众皆认可,其实所知不多的运动。从认知视角看,家庭革命的本意从一开始就被追随者和后之研究者曲解了。那运动本是破坏与建设兼具的,其破坏性不仅在于毁家等直接呼吁,更在于从19—20世纪之交开始,改变了家庭中行事的规矩,拱手将子女教育的责任委诸社会或国家。而五四前后最激进的家庭革命者,也曾强调亲情是新家庭的基础,提倡"将爱情扩充到社会上",最能体现家庭革命的建设性。国民政府建立后,婚姻的有效期问题进入立法机构的正式探讨,表现出从基本层面重新为家庭定位的深谋远虑。过去基于阅读的虚构,中外皆把家庭革命的破坏一面作为常态来接受,却很少顾及其建设的一面。对于这样一种把非常视为正常的世界性误解,特别需要正本清源,有所匡正。 Family revolution in modern China seems to be a widely recognized,but in fact less well understood movement.Viewed from its cognitive sense,the essential meaning of family revolution has been misunderstood by its followers and later researchers from the beginning.As a fact,this movement was both destructive and constructive.Its destructiveness comes not only from direct appeals as family damage,but also from the changes of family routines,such as transferring the responsibility of children s education to the society from the beginning of the 19th to the 20th centuries.Further,the most radical revolutionaries around the May 4th Movement also emphasized that affection is the foundation of a new family,and advocated to extend love into the society,which best reflected the constructiveness of the family revolution.After the establishment of the National Government,the validity of marriage entered the formal discussion of the legislative body,showing the foresight of repositioning the family from a basic level.In the past,based on reading fiction,both Chinese and foreign observers accepted the destructive side of family revolution as the norm,but neglected its constructive side.Thus,this paper concludes that such a global misunderstanding requires a fundamental clarification and correction.
作者 罗志田 Luo Zhitian
出处 《社会科学战线》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期79-88,281,共11页 Social Science Front
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部