摘要
基于史密斯政策执行模型,对我国A市某城区中部分社区的利益相关者进行深度访谈,探究社区协商议事政策推进难的原因并提出可行性建议。研究发现:社区协商议事政策目标模糊及缺乏政策资源、居委会作为执行机构能力和意愿不足、目标群体的高异质性及非高度依赖性以及强调"维稳"的社会环境和"全能政府论"是社区协商议事推进受阻的原因。政府还权于社会的过程中,权力转移需求与权力承接能力之间的不完全契合造成了社区协商议事政策的执行"紧张"。因此应明确政策目标挖掘政策资源,赋能社区居委会并完善考核制度,加强政策解读及培育社区社会资本,形成政策宣传的正确导向,鼓励社区协商议事的创新性实践,充分将党建引领的制度优势转化为治理效能。
Based on the Smith policy implementation model,this paper conducts in-depth interviews with stakeholders in some communities in a central district of city A,and explores the reasons for the difficulty in advancing the city’s community negotiation policy and makes feasible recommendations.The study found that:the vague objectives,lack of policy resources,neighborhood committees’s insufficient in capacity and willingness as an executive institution,target groups’highly heterogeneous and non-dependent,and the social environment that emphasizes“maintenance of stability”and the“omnipotent government theory”are the reason why the advancement of community consultation is blocked.In the process of government restoring power to society,the incomplete agreement between the power transfer demand and the power-taking capacity has caused“tension”in the implementation of community consultation and deliberation policies.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify policy objectives,tap policy resources,empower community neighborhood committees and improve the assessment system,strengthen policy interpretation and cultivate community social capital,form the correct orientation of policy propaganda,encourage innovative practices in community consultation and discussion,and fully transform the institutional advantages of party building into governance efficiency.
出处
《社会福利》
2021年第10期45-51,61,共8页
Social Welfare
关键词
社区协商议事
政策执行
史密斯模型
党建引领
Community Negotiation
Policy Implementation
Smith Policy Implementation Model
Party Building Leadership
