摘要
哲学上的认知融贯强调对信念的证成,但是,司法融贯更关注法律命题的真值。在概念层面上,基地的内部结构化构成了融贯概念的规范性内核。尽管基地是融贯的对象,但是,相较于法律规则,(法律)原则才是融贯更加适宜的“舞台”。其中,(法律)原则可以区分出两个基本类型,即内在融贯与外在融贯。内在融贯关心一组规范架构中诸原则之间的优先关系或相互支持关系,外在融贯基于解释性的全域融贯来回答政治道德原则的合法性问题。
Unlike the emphasis of cognitive coherence on the confirmation of belief,in the judicial field,coherence is more concerned with the truth of legal propositions.At the conceptual level,the inner structure of the base constitutes the normative core of the concept of coherence.Although the base is the object of coherence,compared to legal rules,(legal)principles are the more suitable“stage”for coherence.Among them,two basic types can be distinguished around(legal)principles:intrinsic and extrinsic coherence.The former is concerned with the priority or mutually supportive relations between principles in a set of normative structures,while the latter answers the question of the legitimacy of political-moral principles based on interpretive territorial coherence.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第5期128-145,共18页
Law and Social Development
基金
2023年度中央高校基本科研业务费青年科研创新专项“法学二级学科交叉融合研究”
浙江大学2023年哲学社会科学自主知识体系创新团队项目的阶段性成果
关键词
融贯
司法
基地
内部结构化
原则
Coherence
Judicature
Base
Inner Structure
Principle
