摘要
综合行政执法改革由来已久,其核心是将部分行政执法权分解之后再进行整合。从职权法定的角度来看,这需要通过全国人大及其常委会作出专门决定的方式来弥补改革中部分合法性不足的问题。目前,综合行政执法主体符合行政主体关于组织类型的要求,取得的职责、权限也有国务院或者省级人民政府就综合行政执法改革发布的批准文件、地方性法规、规章等依据。为更好推进综合行政执法改革,应将综合行政执法人员的编制确定为执法类专项编制,实行单独序列管理,或者探索“聘任制”公务员制度。综合行政执法事项应当限定为行政处罚、行政检查和行政强制,并确立复合立体的划转标准,完善综合行政执法的领导机制、权限争议协调机制,以确保在动态调整中合理勘定综合行政执法事项的范围。
The reform of comprehensive administrative law enforcement has a long history,the core of which is to disintegrate some administrative law enforcement powers and then integrate them.From the legal point of view,the NPC and its Standing Committee need to make special decisions to make up for the lack of legitimacy in the reform.At present,the main body of comprehensive administrative law enforcement meets the requirements of the administrative body on the type of organization,and the responsibilities and powers obtained.At the same time,it is also based on the approval documents,local laws and regulations issued by the State Council or the provincial people's government on the reform.In order to better promote the reform,the establishment of comprehensive administrative law enforcement personnel should be determined as a special establishment of law enforcement,the implementation of separate sequence management,or explore the"appointment system"of civil servants.Comprehensive administrative law enforcement matters should be limited to administrative punishment,administrative inspection and administrative coercion,establish a composite and three-dimensional transfer standard,improve the leadership mechanism of comprehensive administrative law enforcement,authority dispute coordination mechanism,to ensure that the scope of comprehensive administrative law enforcement matters in the dynamic adjustment.
作者
蔡金荣
徐海峰
CAI Jin-rong;XU Hai-feng
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2023年第3期1-14,共14页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
基金
国家社科基金项目“党内法规治理效能提升机制研究”(22BDJ097)
关键词
综合行政执法
合法性
主体资格
执法事项范围
omprehensive administrative law enforcement
legitimacy
administrative subject qualification
scope of enforcement matters
