摘要
自李杏英诉上海大润发超市以来,保管合同制度的弊端开始显露。伴随着科技与商业在民事、消费领域的渗透,上述矛盾愈演愈烈。《民法典(草案)》二审稿新增法定保管制度。在此基础之上,保管合同仍然存在法律漏洞,需要引入利益衡量。立法原旨主义所倡导的保管合同的制度利益在今天已失去释放空间,需要借用合同法总则的制度利益进行补位。保管合同中蕴蓄的社会公共利益包括抽象的商业习惯、商业模式、企业家精神以及具体的经济效益。基于利益最大化的考量,在《民法典(草案)》二审稿的制度设计中,保管合同应当在原则上适用有偿推定规则,例外适用无偿推定规则。
Since Li Xing-ying v.Shanghai RT Mart Supermarket,the drawbacks of the custody contract system have begun to emerge.With the penetration of science and technology and commerce in the civil and consumption fields,the above contradictions have become more and more serious.A new legal custody system was added to the Second Review of the Civil Code(Draft).On this basis,the custody contract still has legal loopholes and needs to introduce interest measurement.The institutional benefits of custody contracts advocated by legislative originals have lost the space to be released today and need to be replaced by the institutional benefits of the general principles of contract law.The social and public interests contained in the custody contract include abstract business habits,business models,entrepreneurship and specific economic benefits.Based on the consideration of maximum benefit,in the design of the second review system of the Civil Code(Draft),the custody contract should be governed in principle by the rule of presumption of compensation,with exception of the rule of presumption of compensation.
作者
刘野
LIU Ye(School of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing100084,China)
出处
《前沿》
2019年第6期58-68,共11页
Forward Position
关键词
保管合同
有偿性
无偿性
利益衡量
解释论
custody contract
paid
unpaid
measurement of benefits
interpretation theory
