期刊文献+

克尔凯郭尔反讽个体与马克思现实个体的美学分野

The Difference of Aesthetic Meaning between Kierkegaard’s Ironic Individual and Marx’s Realistic Individual
原文传递
导出
摘要 近代认识论的主客二分使“个性”在存在论上陷入分裂,美学作为沟通这一分裂的桥梁,试图通过想象力的创造性来弥合裂缝。黑格尔是近代美学集大成者,但其思辨体系并未考虑个体的价值。马克思与克尔凯郭尔看到了黑格尔美学的危机,于是重返黑格尔思辨起点“这一个”,重思整全个体的审美价值及其未来。克尔凯郭尔借助反讽辩证法发现了个体的“具体总体性”,将非理性因素纳入人的本质,试图在拓宽对人性的理解中实现“人性解放”。马克思则以劳动辩证法为基础发现了个体的“实践总体性”,从历史性和社会性两方面回答了审美活动与“现实个体”的内在关联,并试图在社会生产实践中凝聚力量来实现“人类解放”。 The dualism of subject and object in modem epistemology has led to a split of individuality in ontology.Aesthetics attempts to bridge the gap through the creativity of imagination,and Hegel’s speculative system turned out to be the epitome of modem aesthetics.However,Hegel’s speculative system did not consider the value of individuality.Marx and Kierkegaard have an insight into this crisis and returned to the starting point of Hegelian speculation,“this one”,to rethink the aesthetic value and future of individual.Kierkegaard uses ironic dialectics to discover the“concrete totality”of individuality,incorporating irrational factors into human nature,and attempting to achieve“humanity liberation”by expanding the understanding of human nature.Marx,on the basis of labor dialectics,discovers the“practical totality”of individuality,answering the inherent relationship between aesthetic activities and“real individuals”from both historical and social perspectives,and attempts to gather strength in social production practice,ultimately achieving“human liberation”.
作者 吴允通 Yuntong WU(Party School of Jiangxi Province Committee of C.P.C)
出处 《马克思主义美学研究》 2023年第2期157-169,481-482,共15页 Research on Marxist Aesthetics
基金 江西省社会科学基金项目“宗教转向视域下洛克哲学的道德基础研究”(项目编号:22ZX02)阶段性成果
关键词 马克思 克尔凯郭尔 个体 反讽 劳动 Karl Marx Kierkegaard individual irony labor
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部