期刊文献+

卓越大学联盟的学科竞争力评价研究——基于国家自然科学基金资助金额的分析 被引量:6

Research on the Evaluation of Disciplinary Competitiveness of the Alliance of Excellent Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大学之间的竞争实质是学科之间的竞争,对学科竞争力进行评价,既有利于高校明确自身的竞争力状况、优势及劣势学科分布情况,也有利于政府、高校更好地制定进一步的发展战略。文章基于2010—2019年国家自然科学基金立项数据,采用静态和动态偏离份额分析法,从学科校内竞争力和学科校间竞争力两方面入手,分析卓越大学联盟高校间的学科发展情况。静态偏离份额分析结果显示,联盟各高校学科发展势头有明显差异,以学科校间竞争优势驱动为主,以学科校内竞争优势驱动为辅;基于动态偏离份额分析法构建出代表学科发展状态的四象限模型,结果显示,联盟高校中超过2/3的学科存在增长乏力等问题。 The essence of the competition between universities is the competition between disciplines.The evaluation of the competitiveness of disciplines is helpful for universities to clarify their own competitiveness status,advantages and disadvantages of disciplines.It is also conducive to the government and universities to better formulate further development strategies.The article is based on the2010-2019 National Natural Science Foundation of China project data,using static and dynamic shiftshare analysis methods,starting with the competitiveness of disciplines and inter-universities,analyzing the development of disciplines among the alliance of excellent universities.The static deviation share analysis results show that there are obvious differences in the discipline development momentum of the universities in the alliance,mainly driven by the competitive advantage of disciplines and schools,supplemented by the competitive advantage of the disciplines within the university.It is further based on the dynamic deviation share analysis method,and a quadrant model constructed with four representative disciplines,and the results show that more than two-thirds of the disciplines in the alliance colleges and universities have problems such as weak growth.
作者 姜华 陈妍君 JIANG Hua;CHEN Yanjun(Dalian University of Technology,Dalian Liaoning 116024)
出处 《现代教育管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第12期1-8,共8页 Modern Education Management
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于多源数据的高校声誉评价研究”(72074039) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于多源数据的‘双一流’政策对高校的影响机制及影响效果评价研究”(20YJC880057)
关键词 学科竞争力 学科竞争力评价 偏离份额分析法 国家自然科学基金 卓越大学联盟 subject competitiveness subject competitiveness evaluation shift-share analysis method National Natural Science Foundation of China excellent university alliance
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献151

共引文献351

同被引文献61

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部