摘要
因教唆犯双重性说存在逻辑性缺陷,以此为理论基础限定的《刑法》第29条第2款可罚类型会导致界限不清与适用不明的问题。为贯彻共犯从属性理念,试图以实行从属性、罪名从属性、预备从属性作为理论基础来限定该款可罚类型的做法,因各自理论本身及其限定的可罚类型问题重重,也不值得提倡。应以教唆犯独立性为理论基底,但需在回应批评基础上作局部修正。从修正的独立性观点出发,该款的可罚类型应重新界定为两类:被教唆人犯意转化实施他罪且与教唆之罪无重合;被教唆人接受教唆未实施任何行为。
Since the theory of the double nature of abettor is flawed in logic,the type of punishment of Article 29,Section 2,which is limited based on the theory,will lead to unclear boundaries and unclear application.In order to carry out the concept of accomplice's subordination,the author tries to limit the punishable types of this article based on the theory of subordination,charge subordination and preparation subordination,but it is not worth advocating because the theory itself and the restricted punishable types have many problems.It should be based on the theory of abettor independence,but in order to respond to the criticism,it should be partially revised.From the viewpoint of revised independence,the types of punishment in this article should be redefined as two types:the instigated person's intention to convert and commit another crime does not coincide with the crime of instigation;the instigated person accepts the instigation of not performing any act.
作者
黄明儒
刘方可
HUANG Ming-ru;LIU Fang-ke(School of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第5期85-104,共20页
Hebei Law Science
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“风险社会背景下行政犯扩张及其适用限缩研究”(19BFX061)
湖南省社会科学基金项目“湖南新型犯罪形势与治理模式研究”(22YBQ046)
湖南省研究生科研创新重点项目“共同犯罪违法所得共同退缴责任研究”(CX20230541)。
关键词
教唆犯
可罚类型
教唆犯独立性
共犯从属性
修正独立性说
the abettor
punishable type
theory of abettor independence
theory of joint crime dependence
modified independence theory
