摘要
现有的行为保全程序仅具有维持现状的功能,无法满足权利人立即停止侵害、回复权利原始状态的需求,因此立法应设置独立的禁令程序以满足权利人的不同诉求。人格权禁令的问世是受知识产权诉前禁令的启发,因此将禁令程序扩展适用于物权、知识产权等绝对权的领域不存在障碍。为了避免出现多个禁令司法解释造成的重复与浪费以及“司法解释立法化”等弊端,《民事诉讼法》应对禁令程序作出统一的规定。在民事程序体系结构中,禁令归属于准诉讼程序,位列民事争讼程序之后,不适用上诉审和再审。禁令程序的裁决具有确定力和执行力,义务人不主动履行义务的,权利人可以申请强制执行。
The existing act preservation procedure only has the function of maintaining the status quo,and cannot meet the demand of the right holder to immediately stop the infringement and restore the original state of the right.Therefore,the legislation should set up an independent injunction procedure to meet the different demands of the right holder.The appearance of the injunction of personality right is inspired by the pre-litigation injunction of intellectual property right,so there is no obstacle to extend the injunction procedure to the domain of absolute right such as real right and intellectual property right.In order to avoid the repetition and waste caused by multiple judicial interpretations of injunctions and the drawbacks of“legalization of judicial interpretations”,the Civil Procedure Law should make unified provisions on injunctions.In the civil procedure system structure,the injunction belongs to the quasi-litigation procedure,which comes after the civil litigation procedure,and does not apply to the appellate trial and retrial.The award of the injunction procedure has deterministic and enforceable force.If the obligor fails to perform his obligations voluntarily,the obligee may apply for compulsory enforcement.
作者
郭小冬
GUO Xiao-dong(School of Law,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第8期15-31,共17页
Hebei Law Science
基金
最高人民法院2021年度司法研究重大课题“人格权侵害禁令适用问题研究”阶段性成果
关键词
禁令程序
准诉讼程序
终局性
确定力
执行力
injunction procedure
quasi-litigation procedure
finality
deterministic force
enforceable force
