摘要
对于一行为触犯数罪名、具有关联性的数行为触犯数罪名应如何处断,不少国家的刑法典中均设有指示规定。通过对德国、意大利、日本等14个国家刑法典中罪数处断的指示规定在立法模式、法条定位、法条构成、法条表述等方面进行比较考察可以发现,“总则集中立法模式”为绝大多数国家所采用;将罪数处断规定纳入“刑罚”域的国家占多数;各国罪数处断规定的法条构成虽然在数量上不尽相同,但基本上都是由适用条件和处断规则构成的,且在法条表述上将这二者合并表述的居多;各国对于不同罪数形态的处断规定既有采用合并表述的做法,也有采用单独表述的做法。在这些国家刑法典中,想象竞合、法条竞合、牵连犯的处断规定的“总则集中立法模式”,罪数处断规定置于总则“刑罚”域的模式,法条竞合与想象竞合的处断规定分开表述的模式,均可为我国刑法借鉴。
There are regulations of directive as to how to punish a behavior violating multiple crimes and the related behavior violating multiple crimes in the criminal codes of many countries.By a comparative study of the regulations on the number of crimes in the criminal codes of 14 countries including Germany,Italy,and Japan in terms of legislative mode,legal article positioning,legal article composition,legal article expression,we can find that the“centralized legislative model of general provisions”is adopted by the vast majority of countries;the punishment provisions on number of crimes are placed in the“penalty”field in most countries;although the number of legal provisions on the number of crimes varies from country to country,it is basically composed of applicable conditions and punishment rules,and most of their legal expressions are combined.The sanctions for different forms of crimes have adopted the method either the combined expression or the separate expression in various countries.In the criminal codes of these countries,the“centralized legislative mode of general provisions”,the“penalty”field of general provisions,and the separate expression of the“overlap of laws”and“concurrence of imagination”can be used for reference in China’s Criminal Law.
出处
《刑法论丛》
2022年第1期261-284,共24页
Criminal Law Review
基金
2017年度国家社科基金项目“刑法指示规定的理论构建与立法技术研究”(项目编号:17BFX077)的阶段性成果
关键词
罪数处断规定
立法模式
法条定位
法条表述
立法技术
punishment provisions on the number of crimes
legislative model
legislative positioning
legislative statement
legislative technology
