摘要
在转型中国的刑法立法论范畴内,关于犯罪圈的划定问题,犯罪化与非犯罪化两种观点在论争中形成了安全维护与自由保护之争、刑法前置与刑法谦抑之争、回应性立法与情绪化立法之争以及刑法治理主义与刑法经济主义之争。以四大争议焦点为核心的犯罪化与非犯罪化之争推进了立法论的研究进程,但也忽视了对争议背后实质问题的进一步探讨,最终导致犯罪化与非犯罪化之争过度追求对立,犯罪化理论的正当性不足以及非犯罪化理论的实践性弱化。故坚持单一的犯罪化理论抑或非犯罪化理论均不能与未来的刑事立法发展相适应。未来的刑事立法改良宜从实质问题入手,立足于积极发展和理性限缩的双重需要,逐步寻求刑法内部安全与自由的价值共存、明确刑法在社会治理体系中的定位、妥善应对民意的建设属性与破坏属性以及建立以治理主义与经济主义为核心的协同评价体系。
In the category of Chinese criminal law legislation during this transitional period,criminalization theory and decriminalization theory have been argued by the delineation of crime circle,including the dispute between safe maintenance and free protection,the dispute between the preposition and the modesty of criminal law,the dispute between responsive legislation and emotional legislation,the dispute between the managerialism and the economism of criminal law.The dispute between criminalization and decriminalization has advanced the research process of the legislative theory,however,it ignores the further discussion of substantive issues behind the controversy.Hence,it finally leads to excessive attention on opposed opinions,criminalization theory lacks legitimacy and the practicality of decriminalization theory weakens.The future of criminal law legislation should start from substantive issues,step by step,to seek for the coexistence of free value and.safety value in the criminal law,to clarify the position of criminal law in the system of social governance,to handle the construction and destruction attributes of public opinion,to establish a collaborative evaluation system with governance and economism as the core.
作者
朱笑延
张旭
Zhu Xiaoyan;Zhang Xu
出处
《刑法论丛》
2020年第2期477-503,共27页
Criminal Law Review
基金
吉林大学学术名家自由探索计划“信息化时代背景下的公民个人信息保护研究”的阶段性成果
关键词
刑事立法
犯罪化
非犯罪化
刑法扩张
criminal legislation
criminalization
decriminalization
the expansion of criminal law
