摘要
对2014~2017年四个统计年度形成的"企业家腐败犯罪案件数据库"进行统计分析,发现呈现出诸多规律性事实:民营企业家腐败犯罪的增幅明显快于国有企业家的腐败犯罪;司法实践中不同身份企业家在腐败犯罪的罪名认定上不断出现交叉情形;企业家腐败犯罪的潜伏期普遍较长;腐败风险遍布于企业日常经营、财务管理、工程承包以及销售、采购等众多经营环节,等等。这提示决策机关需正确判断私营部门的腐败形势,在反腐战略上注意公共部门与私营部门的协调推进;在治理路径上强化刑事预防观念和确立刑事激励制度,充分激发企业家构建企业内部腐败防控机制的主动性与积极性,形成"国家—企业"合作预防新机制。
According to statistical analysis of the"entrepreneur corruption crime case database"formed in the four statistical years from2014 to 2017,we found many regular facts:the number of private entrepreneurs corruption crimes has increased significantly faster than the number of state-owned entrepreneurs corruption crimes;in the judicial practice,the convictions of corruption crimes by entrepreneurs with different identities have repeatedly overlapped;the incubation period of entrepreneurs corruption crimes is generally long;the risks of entrepreneurs corruption exist in many business links,such as the daily operations,financial management,engineering contracting,marketing,purchasing.It suggests that the decision-making organs should correctly judge the corruption situation of the private sectors and pay attention to the coordination of the public sectors with the private sectors in the anticorruption strategy.We should strengthen the concept of criminal prevention and establish a criminal incentive system in the means of governance,and fully stimulate the initiative and enthusiasm of entrepreneurs to build an internal corruption prevention and control mechanism,and form a new mechanism for"nation and enterprise"cooperation prevention.
出处
《刑法论丛》
CSSCI
2018年第4期1-95,共95页
Criminal Law Review
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目“非公经济组织腐败犯罪统计调查与合作预防模式研究”(16AFX010)
国家重点研发计划“公共安全”重点专项“职务犯罪职能评估、预防关键技术研究”项目(2017YFC0804000)之课题四“反腐防控决策模型与评估系统研究”(2017YFC0804004)的阶段性成果
北京师范大学中国企业家犯罪预防研究中心的集体成果.
关键词
企业家腐败犯罪
规模
罪名结构
刑罚适用
高频罪名
Entrepreneur Corruption Crime
Scale
Crime structure
Application of penalty
High frequency crime