摘要
基于私人协商定价过高的谈判成本,法院实际上承担了确定FRAND承诺下标准必要专利许可费的很多工作,“自上而下法”“自下而上法”“可比交易法”是目前各国法院适用的主要确定方法。现有标准必要专利许可费确定路径及方法的适用,在确定依据、决策预期、考量对象等方面存在不同程度的透明性、统一性及全面性问题。通过建构司法外仲裁方式,以国际商事仲裁机构作为确认主体,将标准制定组织的知识产权政策作为规定仲裁条款的规则框架,并对现有商事仲裁程序规则中的受案范围、仲裁员选任、方法适用、结果保密等方面作出相应适配性调整和设计,是突破现有FRAND承诺下标准必要专利许可费确定方法适用困境的可行路径。
Based on the high negotiation cost in private licensing deals,the court undertakes a lot of the work of setting royalties for standards-essential patents under the FRAND commitment,and the“topdown approach”,“bottom-up approach”and“comparable license approach”are the main applicable setting approaches of the court at present.There are different degrees of deficiencies in the transparency,consistency and comprehensiveness for the calculation basis,decision expectation,and consideration factors,if applying the existing setting way and approaches.Building the FRAND rate-setting tribunal is the viable way to break through the bottleneck.International commercial arbitration institutions should be the subject of the FRAND tribunal,standards-setting organization’s intellectual property policy framework will be used as the rules of the arbitration clause,and the existing commercial arbitration rules,such as cognizance of case,selection and appointment of arbitrators,application of methods,confidentiality of results,should be adjusted to adapt the characteristics and need of FRAND rate-setting tribunal.
出处
《法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期146-158,共13页
Law Science
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目《跨国标准必要专利FRAND许可法律问题研究》(21BFX200)的阶段性成果
