摘要
在人类观念史上,存在经验性和规范性两种不同的宪法概念。以构建和约束统治为目标的现代成文宪法,与西方传统的描述政治状态的经验性宪法之间,发生了革命性断裂。现代宪法的规范性和至上性,决定了宪法位阶规范的封闭性。具有制度性权威和规范约束力的真正宪法渊源,只能是宪法典自身。但是,存在基于内容而构成合宪性审查实质理由的其他法律素材和因素,其得以被吸纳的条件在于与形式宪法的一致性。应当建构与法学方法论联结的宪法渊源理论,恰当界定形式宪法与实质宪法乃至政治实践的相互关系。
In the history of human ideas,there exist two concepts of constitution:the empirical one and the normative one.There is a revolutionary gap between the modern written constitution,which aims to construct and restrain the government,and the empirical constitution,which depicts the political state.The normativity and supremacy of modern constitution determines the exclusiveness of constitutional norms.It is only the constitution itself which has institutional authority and binding effect that may serve as the true source of constitutional norms.However,there are other legal materials and factors the contents of which may constitute substantive grounds of constitutional review,and the condition of their being adopted in the review is their consistency with the constitution.This article argues that a theory of the source of constitutional law should be combined with the legal methodology and constructed in a way to properly define the mutual relationship among formal constitution,substantive constitution and even political practice.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期24-35,共12页
Law Review
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“我国国家权力配置的功能主义原理研究”(项目编号:19BFX041)的阶段性成果
关键词
宪法渊源
规范宪法
古代宪法(制)
宪法至上
合宪性审查
the Source of Constitution
Normative Constitution
Ancient Constitution
the Supremacy of Constitution
Constitutional Review
