摘要
正在讨论中的《行政复议法(修订草案)》在审理程序方面有了较大完善,设置了较为完整的审理程序、丰富了听证程序内容、引入了行政复议委员会的咨询功能。但仍存在诸多不足,主要体现为一般程序的规范性不足,简易程序的设置缺乏科学性等。行政复议审理程序是行政复议制度的核心和关键,必须进一步完善和优化,这是适应行政复议功能不断拓展的必然要求,也是查清案件事实和提高行政复议效率的需要。要对行政复议审理的一般程序进行重构,在吸收听证程序内容的基础上设置完整、规范的一般程序,并以此为基础设置简易程序。同时,要确保行政复议机构的相对独立性,为行政复议审理程序作用的充分发挥奠定基础。
The draft of the Administrative Reconsideration Law has been greatly improved in the trial procedure,including the establishment of a more complete trial procedure,theenrichment of the hearing procedure and the addition of the advisory function of the administrative reconsideration committee.However,there are still many deficiencies,mainly reflected in the lack of standardization of the general procedure and the lack of scientific procedures of the summary procedure,etc..The trial procedure is the core of the administrative reconsideration system,and must be perfected and optimized,which is the inevitable requirement of expanding the administrative reconsideration function and the need of finding out the facts of the case.The complete and standard general procedure should be set upon the basis of absorbing the contents of the hearing procedure,and then the summary procedure should also be based on this basis.At the same time,the relative independence of the Administrative Reconsideration Body should be ensured to lay the foundation for the full play of the administrative reconsideration procedure.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第4期47-57,共11页
Law Science Magazine
基金
“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助”(项目编号:B220207040)的阶段性成果
关键词
行政复议审理程序
一般程序
简易程序
the trial procedure of administrative reconsideration
general procedure
summary procedure
