摘要
在苏州书局本与群玉斋本《儒林外史》的区分问题上,学界存在不同看法。经考辨,苏州书局刊刻《儒林外史》一事当属确凿,而群玉斋与苏州官方也有所关联,但二者关系未能确证,故以金和跋文来区分“苏州书局本”与“群玉斋本”,仍较妥当。在严禁小说的背景下,苏印本的出现反映了官方对《儒林外史》的肯定及其对小说的矛盾态度。金和为苏局本所作的跋文就集中体现了这种心理。但无论如何,苏局本对《儒林外史》在咸丰乱后的刊刻、评点及现代意义上的学术研究都产生了影响。在齐省堂本、申报馆本、张文虎、平步青、胡适、鲁迅等的质疑、删节、重释中,金和的跋文得到了选择性接受。这一过程体现了近现代时期不同小说观念的碰撞与演进。
The scholars have different views on distinguishing the Edition of The Scholars printed by Qun Yu Zhai and that printed by Suzhou Printing Bureau.By investigation,the fact of Suzhou Printing Bureau’s printing The Scholars was true,and Qun Yu Zhai had connection with the government as well,but no hard evidence has been found the Suzhou Printing Bureau and Qun Yu Zhai had connection,so distinguishing two editions by afterword written by Jinhe has still been reliable.It the background of banning novels,the appearance of The Scholars published from Suzhou reflected the official recognition for this novel and the its contradictory attitude towards novels.The afterword written by Jinhe have obviously displayed the attitude.In any event,The Scholars printed by Suzhou Printing Bureau influenced the printing and commenting after chaos occurred during the time when the emperor Xianfeng was in power and even the modem academic researching.From the disagreement,retrenchments or reexplanation by Qi Shen Tang,Shen Bao Guan,Zhangwenhu,Pingbuqing,Hushi or Luxun,the afterword written by Jinhe had been partly accepted.The process could reflect the difference in concept of novels during modern times in China.
出处
《都市文化研究》
2022年第1期73-91,共19页
Urban Cultural Studies
关键词
苏州书局
群玉斋
《儒林外史》
近现代传播
小说观念
Suzhou Printing Bureau
Qun Yu Zhai
The Scholars
Influence
The concept on the novel
