摘要
制定法解释中的新文本主义是在回应意图主义的过程中产生的解释理论,相比倡导显明含义规则的旧文本主义,它坚决反对诉诸立法意图以及援引与之相关的论据。在解释方法上,新文本主义提倡以词典释义作为文义解释的出发点,积极运用解释准则处理疑难问题,鼓励法官参考制定法的内部语境。由于新文本主义与其他解释理论之间不存在根本性分歧、文本内容无法实现自洽且具体解释方法存在疏漏,解释者在探索一种合理的法律解释框架的过程中,依然需要超越新文本主义。
The new textualism in statutory interpretation is an interpretative theory originated in the process of responding to intentionalism.It firmly declined to resort to legislative intent and revoke related arguments than traditional textualism that advocates plain meaning rule.In terms of interpretation methods,new textualists advocate dictionary definition as the starting point of textual interpretation,actively uses interpretational canons to deal with difficult issues,and encourages judges to refer to the internal context of the enactment.Since there is no fundamental difference between new textualism and other interpretive theories,the inability of texts to achieve self-autonomy,and the defects of specific interpretation methods,it is still necessary to go beyond new textualism and explore a possible interpretive framework.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第5期36-49,共14页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金一般项目(22BFX156)“法律解释中的价值判断研究”
关键词
旧文本主义
新文本主义
显明含义
解释准则
traditional textualism
new textualism
plain meaning
interpretational canon
