摘要
用户通过解除直播充值合同实现平台退款诉求,面临两个法律适用障碍,即充值不退条款效力存疑以及合同解除依据不清。余款不退约定因排除了用户重要权利而无效,故充值不退条款部分无效,这为合同解除提供了空间。由于债务具有强人身依附性、当事人家庭困顿、用户成瘾式意志薄弱等原因,充值合同债务被认为不适于强制履行,应适用司法终止合同规则。充值合同作为预付式继续性合同,属于定期合同,不能适用不定期合同的预告解除规则。用户可以在符合条件时行使消费者后悔权,此时无需承担违约责任。用户因合同解除而承担违约责任,确定返还额度应在尚未打赏的充值额度中扣除平台的信赖利益损失,并基于高额充值与家庭困顿等因素适当调整。
Users face two legal application obstacles when terminating live broadcast recharge contracts,namely,the validity of the non-refundable recharge clause is doubtful and the basis for contract termination is vague.The remaining balance is not refundable because it invalidates the user's important rights,so the non-refundable recharge clause is partially invalid,which provides space for contract termination.Due to the strong personal attachment of the debt,the family's hardship,and the user's addictive weak will,the recharge contract debt is considered unsuitable for forced performance and should apply to judicial termination of contract rules.The recharge contract is a prepaid continuous contract and belongs to a fixed-term contract.It cannot apply the notice termination rules of indefinite contracts.Users can exercise consumer regret rights when they meet the conditions,and they do not need to bear breach of contract responsibilities at this time.Users bear breach of contract responsibilities due to contract termination.The determination of the return amount should deduct the platform's trust interest loss from the recharge amount that has not been rewarded,and appropriately adjust based on factors such as high recharge and family hardship.
出处
《东方法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第6期106-117,共12页
Oriental Law
关键词
平台直播
充值合同
充值不退条款
合同解除
消费者
后悔权
platform live broadcast
recharge contract
non-refundable recharge clause
contract termination
consumer
regret right
