摘要
冷冻胚胎案二审判决的核心用语是"监管和处置",法院判决肯定对冷冻胚胎可以占有,实则默认冷冻胚胎为物。物是占有的财产,冷冻胚胎也具有财产和物的一般的属性。在承认胚胎为特殊物的基础上,检讨既有理论尝试提出的"伦理物"和"人格物"等概念,其在逻辑和理论的自洽性上都存在缺陷。禁止代孕和对处分的限制,是公序良俗原则的具体要求,揭橥了防范危害家庭关系之考量。
The core concept of the second trial judgment of frozen embryo case is"supervision and disposal".After analyzing it,the court’s judgment affirms that frozen embryo can be possessed,but in fact it is tacit that frozen embryo is a thing.The substance is the possession property,and the frozen embryo also has the general property of property and subsance.On the basis of recognizing embryo as a special object,this paper reviews the concepts of"ethical object"and"personality object"proposed by existing theories,which have defects in logic and theoretical self consistency.Prohibition of surrogacy and punishment is a specific requirement of public order and good customs,exposing the need to prevent endangering family relations.
出处
《朝阳法律评论》
2020年第1期136-149,共14页
Chaoyang Law Review
关键词
冷冻胚胎
占有
权利能力
人格
处分
frozen embryo
possession
right and ability
personality
punishment
