摘要
近年来,标准必要专利许可费纠纷发展愈发复杂化,并且往往以国际平行诉讼的方式呈现,各国通过禁诉令、禁执令、反禁诉令等方式争夺标准必要专利纠纷的司法管辖权,我国企业所受影响较大,2020年,最高法院为捍卫司法主权接连做出四个关于标准必要专利许可纠纷的禁诉令的裁定,并在民事诉讼领域创造性地适用按日顶格罚款的计罚方式。通过研究国内外标准必要专利许可费纠纷中禁诉令的适用,提出相应的完善对策,在坚持司法礼让的原则下,积极应对标准必要专利纠纷司法管辖权的争夺,维护有序的国际市场和司法环境。
In recent years,the development of standard essential patent license fee disputes have become more and more complex,and often present in the form of international parallel litigation.Countries compete for the jurisdiction of standard essential patent disputes through injunction,injunction and anti-injunction,which has a great impact on Chinese enterprises.In 2020,in order to safeguard judicial sovereignty,China has successively made four injunctions sentences on standard necessary patent disputes,and creatively applied the method of daily maximum fine in the field of civil litigation.By studying the application of injunction in standard necessary patent disputes at home and abroad,this paper puts forward corresponding improvement countermeasures,actively responds to the competition for jurisdiction in standard necessary patent disputes under the principle of judicial comity,and maintains an orderly international market and judicial environment.
作者
于群
李娜
YU Qun(School of Law,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处
《长春工程学院学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第3期5-9,共5页
Journal of Changchun Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
广州市哲学社会科学“十四五”规划学科共建课题——我国标准必要专利许可费的确认机制研究(项目编号:2021GZGJ230)
关键词
标准必要专利
司法管辖权
司法礼让
禁诉令
standard essential patent
jurisdiction
judicial comity
injunction
