摘要
在西方话语体系中,协商治理源于对代议制民主的改进,追求的是协商过程民主,忽略协商的治理结果。这种界定遮蔽了中国历史进程中丰富的协商治理实践,导致人们对协商治理内涵和价值理解存在认识限度,造成协商治理在当今中国基层的实践中存在误区。中国的基层协商治理还需要从传统资源中发掘本土案例,总结中国经验。"街面理"是传统中国乡村社会协商治理的一种实践,它是指民众自发或者被乡村权威引导在"街面"上,针对私利和公利进行相互讨论、交换意见、辨别是非、达成一致意见的协商过程。"街面理"之所以能维护乡村秩序,确保公共利益实现,在于其具备"街面"的公共空间、公共道理和无讼文化、多方参与的利益制衡、族权绅权的乡村权威和基于协商的对话讨论等逻辑要素。"街面理"在当下中国乡村协商治理中可以提供重建"公共话语场",重塑"公共话语权",培育"公共话语人"等经验,并进一步充实中国传统乡村社会横向协商治理的实践。
In the western discourse system,consultative governance origi-nates from the improvement of representative democracy,which seeks more de-mocracy in the process of consultation and neglects the results of consultativegovernance.This definition conceals the rich practice of consultative governancein the course of Chinese history,leads to the limitation of people.s understandingof the connotation and value of consultative governance,and leads to misunder-standings in the practice of consultative governance at the grass-roots level inChina today.China.s grassroots consultative governance also needs to explore lo-cal cases from traditional resources and summarize China.s experience.StreetReason is a practice of consultative governance in traditional Chinese rural socie-ty.It refers to a consultative process in which people spontaneously or authorita-tively gather in the rural“public discourse field”to discuss,exchange opinions,distinguish right from wrong and reach consensus on private interests and publicinterests in a society lacking administrative power.The reason why“street prin-ciple”can maintain rural order and ensure the realization of public interests liesin its following negotiation logic:public space,axiomatic consensus,non-litiga-tion culture,interest balance,multi-participation,extensive dialogue and ruralauthority.Street Reasoning can provide experience in rebuilding“public dis-course field”,reshaping“public discourse right”,cultivating“public discour-ser”and further enriching the practice of horizontal consultative governance inChinese traditional rural society.
作者
孙强强
Sun Qiangqiang(China Rural Research Institute,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079)
出处
《中国农村研究》
2021年第1期344-361,共18页
China Rural Studies
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重点项目“作为政策和理论依据的深度中国乡村调查与研究”(16JJD810004)
教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“乡规民约与乡村基层治理法治化的对接机制研究”(16YJC810011)的阶段性成果
