摘要
21世纪以来,以汪毓和、陈聆群和刘再生等为代表的中国近代音乐史学学者,相继修订、写作并出版了几部新面孔的中国近代音乐史专著,他们对世纪之交的“重写音乐史”论争中所提出的诸多问题,如对音乐家的入史选择、叙述模式和历史评判等,都给予了充分的关注和部分的改进,但依旧留下了隐而不显的近代音乐家名册,如洛辛、丁珰、胡敬熙等,这便是本文纳入“隐册”范畴的研究对象。中国近代音乐家的“隐册”,给音乐史的研究和教学,带来了知识和学术的诸多“困扰”,亟待在学术观念、研究方法和价值判断上,予以新的研究范式的求证。新的研究,须回归实证的研究传统,关注“被遗忘权”的新式法规的运用,厘清中国近代音乐史的史事,实证其“隐事”,匡正其“隐册”。
In the 21st century,modern Chinese music historians represented by Wang Yuhe,Chen Lingqun,and Liu Zaisheng had successively revised,written and published several new monographs about modern Chinese music history.Many debates of the“rewriting the music history”happened at the turn of the century,such as the choice,narrative mode and historical judgement of musicians.And these issues have been focused comprehensively and improved partially.Regretfully,there are some modern musicians,such as Luo Xin,Ding Yan,Hu Jingxi,etc.are still not mentioned in the music history,so they become the research object of the be shielded category.The be shielded modern Chinese Musicians have been the intellectual and academic conundrums of music history research and teaching,so it is urgent to proof a new research paradigm for them.Upon verified in terms of academic concepts,research methods and value judgments,the new research method must be traditionally empirical research,focus on the use of new“right to be forgotten”regulation,so that the historical events in the modern Chinese music can be clarified,and to confirm their“shielded events”and correct their status that“be shieled”.
出处
《北方音乐》
2022年第2期47-60,共14页
Journal of the Northern Music
关键词
中国近代
音乐家
“隐册”
“被遗忘权”
研究范式
求证
Modern China
musicians
“Be Shielded Category”
“right to be forgotten”
research paradigm
verification
