摘要
专家审稿意见是科技期刊在同行评议过程中学术价值最高的部分,具有一定的发表价值,但在目前多数科技期刊普遍实行的盲法审稿方式下,审稿意见只在专家、编辑和作者之间传递,造成学术资源的巨大浪费。而今同行评议方式向着更多元、更公开的方向发展,公开发表专家审稿意见可以作为实施开放式同行评议的尝试和突破,具有可行性和实践意义。本文建议采取先“精选”后“普及”、逐步推进的审稿意见发表方式,总结出精选审稿意见的遴选标准和程序,讨论了公开发表专家审稿意见对编辑工作的意义,以期为促进同行评议模式的转变,实施开放式同行评议打下基础。
Expert review opinions are the most academic part of scientific and technical periodicals in the process of peer review.However,these valuable opinions can only be transmitted among experts,editors and authors when blind reviewing process are widely adopted,resulting in a huge waste of academic resources.At present,the ways of peer review are being more diversified and open,thus the publication of expert review opinions can be an attempt and breakthrough in the implementation of open peer review with feasibility and significance.Here,it is suggested that we can choose the excellent review opinions to publish at the beginning,and then gradually proceed to publish all.This paper also summarizes the selection criteria and procedures of how to select those excellent review opinions,and discusses the significance of publishing expert review opinions to the editors,aming to promote the transformation of peer review mode and lay a sound foundation for the implementation of open peer review in the future.
作者
吴爱华
王姝
WU Aihua;WANG Shu(Editorial Department of West China College of Stomatology,Sichuan University,610041,Chengdu,China)
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期523-527,共5页
Acta Editologica
