摘要
查戈斯群岛咨询意见案涉及非自治领土在非殖民化进程中的领土主权完整和民族自决权。国际法院对毛里求斯的领土主权给予了充分的支持,并强调英国从毛里求斯分裂查戈斯群岛的行为损害了毛里求斯的民族自决权。由于国际法院对岛民权益的分析基本延续了西撒哈拉案中对伊弗尼族群的处理方法,咨询意见在推进安置岛民的问题上能发挥的作用有限,但它对于敦促英国尽快结束对查戈斯群岛的非法占有,最终归还属于毛里求斯的领土无疑意义重大。
In the Chagos Advisory Opinion,the International Court of Justice(ICJ)fully endorsed the territorial integrity of Mauritius.It also highlighted that the detachment of Chagos Archipelagos by the UK is against Mauritius’right to self-determination.The ICJ adopted a similar approach as with the Ifni population in the South Sahara Case when it came to the issue of the Chagossians.Thus the Chagos Advisory Opinion is of limited effect for the relocation of the Chagossians.Nevertheless,the conclusion that the ICJ made regarding the right to self-determination is of great significance for urging the UK to end its illegal administration of the Chagos Archipelago and to return the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius.
出处
《国际关系与国际法学刊》
2020年第1期200-223,共24页
Journal of International Relations and International Law
关键词
国际法院咨询意见
民族自决权
非殖民化
领土主权
查戈斯群岛
ICJ Advisory Opinion
Peoples’Right to Self-Determination
Decolonization
Territorial Sovereignty
Chagos Archipelago
