摘要
知识生产模式理论对研究公安学科知识发生、发展具有重要意义。在经历国外引进吸收与公安工作经验总结两个阶段后,当前我国公安学科知识生产呈现着“学科化”和“问题域”的两种倾向。究其来源,这两种倾向在理论上能够寻根于知识生产模式Ⅰ、Ⅱ,在实践中能够对公安学科研究产生实际影响和现实作用,特别是导致了公安学科在学科形态、学科体系、学科团队与知识生产过程、学科知识成果形式、学科知识生产评估机制等五个方面产生一系列矛盾与冲突。从知识生产角度看,这种矛盾冲突是客观存在的,是制约当前公安学科建设发展的根源所在。在多维异质的现代知识网络中,知识生产模式Ⅲ为构建公安学科现代学科范式提供了可资借鉴的视角。据此要从价值整合、组织整合、动力整合、文化整合以及学科传承等五个角度重构公安学科建设的发展路径。
The theory of paradigm and knowledge production mode is of great significance to the study of the occurrence and development of public security discipline knowledge. After the introduction and absorption of foreign theories and the summarization of public security work experience, there are two kinds of tendencies for the knowledge production of public security discipline: the disciplinary and the problem domains. Although these two tendencies have not been labeled academically, they can be rooted in knowledge production mode Ⅰ and Ⅱ in theory, and can also exert their influence on the research of the public security discipline in practice, especially leading to a series of practical contradictions and conflicts in the five aspects of public security discipline, such as discipline form, discipline system, discipline team and knowledge production process, discipline knowledge achievement form, discipline knowledge production evaluation mechanism, etc. From the perspective of knowledge production, this contradiction exists objectively and is the root of restricting the current construction and development of public security discipline. In the multi-dimensional and heterogeneous modern knowledge network, knowledge production mode Ⅲ provides a reference perspective for the construction of the modern paradigm of public security discipline. Based on mode Ⅲ, we should reconstruct the development path of public security discipline from five perspectives: value integration, organizational integration,dynamic integration, cultural integration and discipline inheritance.
出处
《公安学研究》
2022年第6期98-120,122,共24页
Journal of Public Security Science
